Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by yzedf
That is the IBM version of the PPC.

Apple had jumped onto the G4 bandwagon with Motorola by then :(
what does that even mean? i thought PPC was an architecture, like x86. i think IBM has many versions of the PPC, including the 970 and the G3. i don't think this processor we are discussing is either, though i really don't know much about it.
 
x86 and PPC are the architectures...

Mine was a reference to Apple choosing Motorola over IBM for their "top of the line" processor.
 
okay, i'd always understood why people were so down on moto, but now i really understand. holy cow.

that sucks.

i mean, that really sucks.

*sigh* history is history, right?

matt
 
Originally posted by yzedf
x86 and PPC are the architectures...

Mine was a reference to Apple choosing Motorola over IBM for their "top of the line" processor.
ok, yeah.

man, was this IBM thing not too special for the time, or was there really an indication that apple was going downhill with motorola carrying it there, even that early?
 
Originally posted by applemacdude
stupid idiots @ apple:mad:

-applemacdude

Actually, blame the lawyers as this was a contractural obligation on Apple to not go back to a G3 as the flagship chip once committed to the G4.

Both IBM and Apple may now regret it. But I think with the 970, and I know with the 980, this little dark time in the performance of Apple machines will pass. We live and learn, and so does Apple and IBM.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.