Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

beowulf359

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 15, 2014
2
0
Given Apple's move with the Mac Pro to a default dual-GPU configuration, is there any chance that we'll soon see an iMac with dual mobile GPUs?

While the iMac makes a great general purpose computer, it's missing desktop GPU performance which is important to some users (like myself); having dual GPUs with SLI/Crossfire support for gaming in addition to OpenCL support seems like a win/win for its product line.

An iMac like this would have fewer "professional" options like Xeon CPUs and desktop GPUs, but might make the gap between the different desktop product lines a little softer ($4,000 for a top-end iMac with included screen vs $5,500 for a nice Mac Pro without a monitor).

I realize that Mac OS doesn't support SLI/Corssfire for gaming today, but that support could be added in a future OS update (easily?).
 
My guess, given the current design of the machine, is probably quite low. I don't see how they could put in a sufficient cooling system.

Now, could they use one D300-type GPU? Perhaps...
 
Given Apple's move with the Mac Pro to a default dual-GPU configuration, is there any chance that we'll soon see an iMac with dual mobile GPUs?

While the iMac makes a great general purpose computer, it's missing desktop GPU performance which is important to some users (like myself); having dual GPUs with SLI/Crossfire support for gaming in addition to OpenCL support seems like a win/win for its product line.

An iMac like this would have fewer "professional" options like Xeon CPUs and desktop GPUs, but might make the gap between the different desktop product lines a little softer ($4,000 for a top-end iMac with included screen vs $5,500 for a nice Mac Pro without a monitor).

I realize that Mac OS doesn't support SLI/Corssfire for gaming today, but that support could be added in a future OS update (easily?).

The speed of the high end iMac already cannibalizes low level Pros as it is (especially photograhy)... I really can't see them really cutting into the low end "Pro" market but adding dual GPU's. Further the physical size wouldn't allow for the air flow/cooling necessary. They would also have to add a larger power supply.

You are more likely to next year's iMac have TB2 which would allow for more bandwidth and thus better performance from external GPU setups.
 
[[ What is the likelihood of an iMac with 2 GPUs within the next year? ]]

My guess is: "0".

They don't want to position the iMac in direct competition with the new Mac Pro.
 
The point of twin gpu at this point is 4k - a specialty given how few displays there currently are. If at the point in the future when 4k is ubiquitous, a single gpu supports it, twin gpu would again be a specialty.
 
Most of the responses in this thread could be considered short-sighted given that almost all features found in today's iMac were once reserved for more specialized hardware (multiple cores/CPUs, 64-bit addressable memory, SSDs, PCI-Express busses, 1440p resolution for the 27" display, etc).

The one technical argument posed that has some weight to it is that adding a second mobile GPU to the existing iMac would increase the demands of the power supply by about 122 watts. Given that reports of the existing model runs quite cool when in use, I'm not sure if heat would actually be a problem or not. I'm also not sure how much extra heat would be generated by using a power supply with say, an additional 150 watts. Maybe that 150 extra watts is enough to disqualify the idea based on today's technology, but that doesn't mean things won't change in the future.

Another thing to consider is that once the iPad went retina, it basically had 4 GPUs and 2 GPU cores to handle the load of all the additional pixels that needed pushing, in addition to the standard requirements of the OS and software. ElectronGuru points out that GPUs are still increasing significantly in performance, but won't they eventually hit a similar wall that CPUs are struggling with today? I know my question was qualified by "within the next year", but I have to wonder if this won't turn out to be the long term strategy from a hardware engineering perspective.

----------

They don't want to position the iMac in direct competition with the new Mac Pro.

Given that we're talking about mobile GPUs instead of workstation-class GPUs, in addition to the limited processor options (maxed at only 4 cores instead of 12), lack of ECC memory, and a few other things I'm probably forgetting, I'm not sure that dual GPUs in an iMac would make it more attractive to the target audience of the Mac Pro.
 
The point of twin gpu at this point is 4k - a specialty given how few displays there currently are. If at the point in the future when 4k is ubiquitous, a single gpu supports it, twin gpu would again be a specialty.

No, the point is openCl. And as more and more openCl programs are written, more demand will be there. Dual workstation class gpu's? No way, never. Not even a single workstation gpu. But dual mobile gpu's? Yup. RMBP already has a model with dual cards.....iMac will be next.
 
Most of the responses in this thread could be considered short-sighted given that almost all features found in today's iMac were once reserved for more specialized hardware (multiple cores/CPUs, 64-bit addressable memory, SSDs, PCI-Express busses, 1440p resolution for the 27" display, etc).

You asked for an opinion, and all the responses you got pointed to No. Yes, things might change 5 to 10 years down the road, but you asked the likelihood for next year, which has a .01% of happening. No need to get upset because you didn't get the answer you wanted to hear.
 
No, the point is openCl. And as more and more openCl programs are written, more demand will be there. Dual workstation class gpu's? No way, never. Not even a single workstation gpu. But dual mobile gpu's? Yup. RMBP already has a model with dual cards.....

It's not really dual cards in the rMBP.

The Intel integrated graphics is built in to the CPU processor die, so it's there regardless of whether or not Apple chooses to use it. Then for the upper models there's a separate mobile GPU - thus the two graphics options.

But it's not the same as having two mobile GPU chips on board.
 
It's not really dual cards in the rMBP.

The Intel integrated graphics is built in to the CPU processor die, so it's there regardless of whether or not Apple chooses to use it. Then for the upper models there's a separate mobile GPU - thus the two graphics options.

But it's not the same as having two mobile GPU chips on board.

Overwhelmingly this. Not to mention only the high-end version of the current 15" iteration includes the dGPU (which isn't even an option for the base model). All signs point to the next generation rMBP models dropping dGPU altogether in favor of purely integrated graphics.
 
I would love to have a dual GPU-setup in the next iMac, but I just can't see it happens with the present form factor. Hopefully the next generation Nvidia GPU will deliver a proper performance boost for those of us who like to game, but not using two different computer systems - one for gaming, one for work.
 
I would love to have a dual GPU-setup in the next iMac, but I just can't see it happens with the present form factor. Hopefully the next generation Nvidia GPU will deliver a proper performance boost for those of us who like to game, but not using two different computer systems - one for gaming, one for work.

The tricky thing is that even if the new GPU's will be more powerful, the new games will be even more demanding. The mobile GPU will need to catch up to the desktop GPU market and I don't see that happening as soon as the next iMac..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.