And on an even more technical level, regulatory filings for the original iPad 2 did not include Siri, which would be considered added value if made available after-the-fact.
This is the same reason that FaceTime was $.99 in the Mac App Store for any Mac that came out before it was available, it's not that Apple needs that dollar, it's a legal issue.
Along these same lines, I'm not sure how they would charge a fee for a core OS feature like Siri through the App Store for iPad 2 users, etc.
And on an even more technical level, regulatory filings for the original iPad 2 did not include Siri, which would be considered added value if made available after-the-fact.
This is the same reason that FaceTime was $.99 in the Mac App Store for any Mac that came out before it was available, it's not that Apple needs that dollar, it's a legal issue.
Along these same lines, I'm not sure how they would charge a fee for a core OS feature like Siri through the App Store for iPad 2 users, etc.
do you have a source for the FaceTime legal issues? I'm interested about why, or if you know and would like to enlighten me.
It's a Sarbanes-Oxley requirement that prevents companies from recognizing revenue until the "full" product has been delivered: http://appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/21/inside_apples_iphone_subscription_accounting_changes
It's a Sarbanes-Oxley requirement that prevents companies from recognizing revenue until the "full" product has been delivered: http://appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/21/inside_apples_iphone_subscription_accounting_changes
Though, you think if that was really the blocking issue, they could've "sold" Siri to iPad 2 owners for $1.99 or so.
Bull. Siri was a stand-alone application that ran just fine on the iPhone 4. Apple discontinued the application when they purchased the company.It came out before the 4S and the debut of Siri. On a technical level, it only has one microphone and it lacks the noise cancellation feature that the 4S and other devices has.
It was a free application until Apple purchased Siri.Though, you think if that was really the blocking issue, they could've "sold" Siri to iPad 2 owners for $1.99 or so.
Don't post false conjecture. That is incorrect. Siri (the stand-alone application) ran just fine on my iPad 1!There's also a new chip in each device the supports Siri that was not installed in the iPad 2.
Bull. Siri was a stand-alone application that ran just fine on the iPhone 4. Apple discontinued the application when they purchased the company.
Don't post false conjecture. That is incorrect. Siri (the stand-alone application) ran just fine on my iPad 1!
Why is Siri is specially case here? Why this rule does not apply to features say: FaceTime Audio or iMessage. These features weren't available when iPad 2 came out
It had the A5 chip, just like 4S, iPT 5G, and the ipad 3 and the iPad mini 1, so what technical reason was there that the ipad 2 not able to have Siri?
You'd have to talk to an accountant to get anything close to the right answer, and probably someone at Apple or the SEC to get all the details. My hunch would be that iMessage could be considered a riff off the existing email "messaging" functionality so it's not like they added anything really, and FaceTime Audio came out WAY past the 24 months during which the first iPad 2s' revenue was recognized under the old rules. After that, I'm pretty sure it's fair game.
And on an even more technical level, regulatory filings for the original iPad 2 did not include Siri, which would be considered added value if made available after-the-fact.
This is the same reason that FaceTime was $.99 in the Mac App Store for any Mac that came out before it was available, it's not that Apple needs that dollar, it's a legal issue.
Along these same lines, I'm not sure how they would charge a fee for a core OS feature like Siri through the App Store for iPad 2 users, etc.
Although the app store Siri didn't have as many features as built-in Siri, that's primarily because of the development time, not any noise cancellation hardware. You apparently never used the app-store version.Apple's Siri is more powerful than the App Store Siri and requires more resources to work at the high standards Apple sets forth for its products. It uses noise cancellation features that are not available on the iPad 2. The iPhone 4+, iPad 3+, iPad Mini+, and iPod Touch 5 all have noise cancellation built in. Nothing male bovine about it when you become learned.
Although the app store Siri didn't have as many features as built-in Siri, that's primarily because of the development time, not any noise cancellation hardware. You apparently never used the app-store version.
Think about it -- requiring noise cancellation hardware to work? Sure that will improve speech recognition, but it will not *prevent* it from working.
It's a Sarbanes-Oxley requirement that prevents companies from recognizing revenue until the "full" product has been delivered: http://appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/21/inside_apples_iphone_subscription_accounting_changes
You also have to consider how Siri actually works (the non- app store version). Users can either place the handset to their ear or hold the home key from anywhere. Given iOS's structure, an app store downloadable would be unable to do the same.
Although the app store Siri didn't have as many features as built-in Siri, that's primarily because of the development time, not any noise cancellation hardware. You apparently never used the app-store version.
Think about it -- requiring noise cancellation hardware to work? Sure that will improve speech recognition, but it will not *prevent* it from working.
What does that have to do with not being able to run on the iPad 2? (original topic)You also have to consider how Siri actually works (the non- app store version). Users can either place the handset to their ear or hold the home key from anywhere. Given iOS's structure, an app store downloadable would be unable to do the same.