Okay, this may sound kinda stupid and a bit lame, but honestly what sold me on the Apple Watch was the Mickey Mouse watch face. Apart from that, every thing else is a bonus.
If people don't mind looking like someone who wanted an Apple Watch but had to revert so something else ;-) (this is what "copying" Apple's presentation on a different device makes me think of anyway)
yes, because apple invented the mickey mouse watch face...................
yes, because apple invented the mickey mouse watch face...................
If people don't mind looking like someone who wanted an Apple Watch but had to revert so something else ;-) (this is what "copying" Apple's presentation on a different device makes me think of anyway)
No one said that.
But if you are loading that skin today on another smart-watch ... it might have something to do with yesterday's event.
This type of retort is used FAR too often.
Someone says something good about an Apple product, a hater replies 'Yeah, Apple didn't invent that, or wasn't first'...
sigh. All people are saying is they like something Apple did, not that Apple was first or invented it. RARELY does someone say that, but the opposition acts like people say it all the time.
It's just used far too often to try to slam someone and doesn't add anything to the conversation.
Does he dance??
I LOVE the Mickey Mouse watch face!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
----------
Does he dance??
No one said that.
But if you are loading that skin today on another smart-watch ... it might have something to do with yesterday's event.
Okay, this may sound kinda stupid and a bit lame, but honestly what sold me on the Apple Watch was the Mickey Mouse watch face. Apart from that, every thing else is a bonus.
Travelling back in time?
----------
And if you had that skin months ago? As its a common one in the wearables community?
----------
So your okay with people rewriting history, but the retort is going to far.......mkay.....