Maybe there's just no reporting - because (I'm also just guessing) the device is so different that the reporters are simply missing potential leaks (because they don't know what they are seeing)
Could be.
I recall that almost no real info was available before the first iPhone was announced.
True, there are a lot of similarities.
- With the iPhone, by mid 2006, everyone knew that it was coming by either the end of the year or early 2007.
- By November 2006, we even knew that Foxconn was the manufacturer, and rumors said it would ship in 4GB and 8GB versions.
- In December 2006 it was reported that the iPhone would be GSM/EDGE only, and probably launch on Cingular (AT&T).
So, just as with the "iWatch", we knew a lot of info, but not the important overall look or UI.
The "iWatch/iTime/etc/etc" may have a similar announcement, and AFTER the announcement, you'll hear lots of tech news say something like "Oh, that's what THAT thing was! I never connected that to anything Apple "
Speaking of missed clues, black faced capacitive screen phones were all the rage at cell phone shows in 2006, and it was predicted that they'd be commonplace by the end of 2007. Reporters paid little attention, though.
There aren't any leaks cuz it hasn't left the apple design lab. The reason why we see leaks of iPhones is because it is being manufactured and handled by others outside of apple. Also, it takes a while for apple to get FCC clearance to sell a new device. Remember the first iPhone introduction? Steve jobs announced it in January and it went on sale in June... That gave them time to create ad campaigns, manufacturing plans... And FCC APPROVAL. Once the FCC gets it, they legally have to post the filings for the public to view (taking the lid off the product).
So... you're predicting that the "iWatch" will be announced six months ahead of time?
Jobs did not have to announce the iPhone ahead of time. Apple didn't even get FCC approval until May, and even then they requested secrecy until July.
The only thing the FCC had to post were the SAR reports and the location of the FCC label. So the only thing we'd have known was that it had no 3G and that the back looked like this: (This is the official FCC filing)
Which looked pretty much like a longer iPod. There was no indication of a touchscreen, or flat front, the touch UI, or anything like that.
(If they had had a removable back, then we'd have known even less, because the sticker diagram would've shown the battery compartment instead.)
Now, revealing the "iWatch" shape would be much more interesting and informative, I think. Although, as with the iPhone shape, it would tell us nothing about the UI or other capabilities.