Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Romasport

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 14, 2012
3
0
Greetings all,

I have a MBP 13 Mid 2010 with 8GB RAM and a 256GB SSD drive.

I'm thinking about buying a Mac Mini in a trip to US in October, as a replacement, but I don't know which one would suit me better...

Besides the basic tasks, I also work with VMs (Windows 8.1 and Ubuntu) and LR5 with RAW files, and, occassionaly, I do some coding and some video editing.

So the questions are:

  • Should I go for the dual core model or the quad core?
  • If the quad core is the way to go, what do you thing about the 2.3 vs 2.6 model?
  • As I live in a place where temperatures are high most of the time, my main concern is about heating. Any tips or advices?

Considering the cost/benefit and the heating issue, I appreciate any advices!(and, yes, I will upgrade the little beast to 16GB RAM and a SSD..:))
 
Greetings all,

I have a MBP 13 Mid 2010 with 8GB RAM and a 256GB SSD drive.

I'm thinking about buying a Mac Mini in a trip to US in October, as a replacement, but I don't know which one would suit me better...

Besides the basic tasks, I also work with VMs (Windows 8.1 and Ubuntu) and LR5 with RAW files, and, occassionaly, I do some coding and some video editing.

So the questions are:

  • Should I go for the dual core model or the quad core?
  • If the quad core is the way to go, what do you thing about the 2.3 vs 2.6 model?
  • As I live in a place where temperatures are high most of the time, my main concern is about heating. Any tips or advices?

Considering the cost/benefit and the heating issue, I appreciate any advices!(and, yes, I will upgrade the little beast to 16GB RAM and a SSD..:))

Either quad core i7, the dual core i5 doesn't properly support virtualization.
 
I would wait just another week before taking a decision see what apple is going to announce...

And rrl, why doesn't the i5 doesn't support virtualization?
 
I would wait just another week before taking a decision see what apple is going to announce...

And rrl, why doesn't the i5 doesn't support virtualization?

I said properly. You can run a VM, but it doesn't support VT-d.

If Wikipedia and Intel are to be believed, I got my information from here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_Mini#Intel-based_Mac_Mini

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture)#Mobile_processors

http://ark.intel.com/products/67355

http://ark.intel.com/products/64900

http://ark.intel.com/products/64891
 


You don't need vt-d for virtualization. Vt-d is for direct IO which is not used in VMware
Fusion/parallel/virtual box.

What you are looking for is vt-x, which is virtualization technology.

Even if you are running ESXi, you don't need direct IO. Unless you want to assign a PCI-E device or a hard drive directly to the vm, which can hardly be done on a mini anyways.
 
You don't need vt-d for virtualization. Vt-d is for direct IO which is not used in VMware
Fusion/parallel/virtual box.

What you are looking for is vt-x, which is virtualization technology.

Even if you are running ESXi, you don't need direct IO. Unless you want to assign a PCI-E device or a hard drive directly to the vm, which can hardly be done on a mini anyways.

I could be wrong, but according to the image below USB devices go through the PCI bus and thus could benefit from VT-d. I just got my i7 Mac Mini on Saturday so I'm not sure yet what impact if any my USB audio interface will have on a Kubuntu 12.04.4 VM.

Screen Shot 2014-09-03 at 10.33.47 AM.png
 
I echo the caution of the previous poster about delaying your purchase-the Mac Mini is very much overdue for a refresh. Maybe next week?

I do not know about the technical aspects of virtualization support, but from experience I can tell you that Parallels (the only VM I have tried) runs so abominably slowly on my 2011 Mac Mini that I had to stop using it.

If you are going to use a VM like Parallels, get the fastest processor you can and all the RAM you can afford. You'll need it.
 
check these out. I did one myself as well, dropped temps by 8-10C

Rather than cut it up, they sell stands that hold the MacMini in a vertical position. As the Mini is, well, mini, having it vertical doesn't take up any space, so it stays cool enough. (I fried my first one, overused it, but it was under AppleCare and it was replaced. No problem so far with the replacement.)
 
I could be wrong, but according to the image below USB devices go through the PCI bus and thus could benefit from VT-d. I just got my i7 Mac Mini on Saturday so I'm not sure yet what impact if any my USB audio interface will have on a Kubuntu 12.04.4 VM.



View attachment 488515


Vt-d would only benefit in a VMware esxi environment. VMware fusion will simply be able to assign your USB device to your vm.

----------

I echo the caution of the previous poster about delaying your purchase-the Mac Mini is very much overdue for a refresh. Maybe next week?

I do not know about the technical aspects of virtualization support, but from experience I can tell you that Parallels (the only VM I have tried) runs so abominably slowly on my 2011 Mac Mini that I had to stop using it.

If you are going to use a VM like Parallels, get the fastest processor you can and all the RAM you can afford. You'll need it.


VM runs abominably slow because of the 5400rpm hdd that is shared with the main OS. And the amount of ram you have in your system comes into play how well your mv will run. A 2011 mini came with 2gb ram. That certainly did not help your experience.

The i5 CPU is plenty for what a consumer would do with a vm.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.