Hi,
If you had a two cameras, a DX and a FX body, a ¨natural choice¨
to cover your range from 28 mm. to 50 mm. (Not important how
much longer the focal length is) could be this lens:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=canon+17-55mm&N=0&InitialSearch=yes
The 17 to 55 mm. f-2.8 covers that range.
However this lens, also covers the range from 28 mm. to 50 mm.
when placed on the DX camera, and can also be used as a
wide angle zoom on the FX body:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=canon+16-35&N=0&InitialSearch=yes
However, how much distorsion is there when using this lens on
the DX body, knowing this lens is made for FX cameras ?? How
much distorsion is there when using this lens at 31 mm., (31 mm.
multiplied by a 1.6 crop factor equals to 49.6 mm. on the DX
body) ?? How strong is the distorsion, or do images really looks
as if they had been taken with a normal lens ??
Thank you, kind regards,
igmolinav
If you had a two cameras, a DX and a FX body, a ¨natural choice¨
to cover your range from 28 mm. to 50 mm. (Not important how
much longer the focal length is) could be this lens:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=canon+17-55mm&N=0&InitialSearch=yes
The 17 to 55 mm. f-2.8 covers that range.
However this lens, also covers the range from 28 mm. to 50 mm.
when placed on the DX camera, and can also be used as a
wide angle zoom on the FX body:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=canon+16-35&N=0&InitialSearch=yes
However, how much distorsion is there when using this lens on
the DX body, knowing this lens is made for FX cameras ?? How
much distorsion is there when using this lens at 31 mm., (31 mm.
multiplied by a 1.6 crop factor equals to 49.6 mm. on the DX
body) ?? How strong is the distorsion, or do images really looks
as if they had been taken with a normal lens ??
Thank you, kind regards,
igmolinav