Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ShMac

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 3, 2007
45
4
Currently we are using Final Cut Express to quickly churn out thousands
of short 2D videos a year. It is time to upgrade/replace our towers and I
would like your opinion on which you would prefer (similar cost) and why.

The question is whether to go with two slower processors and a traditional
moving part drive for the software OR one faster processor and a solid
state drive. However, any other suggestions/ideas are welcome.

OPTION ONE:

One 3.33GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon processor
16GB (4x4GB)
512GB solid-state drive
1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
Two ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB
One 18x SuperDrive

OPTION TWO:

Two 2.40GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon processors (12 cores)
16GB (8x2GB)
1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
Two ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB
One 18x SuperDrive
 
FCE is 32 Bit so throwing anything above 4GB and 4 cores at it will do absolutely nothing for it and encoding takes forever, particularly with higher compressed HD footage.

If FCE is really your thing stick with option one.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.