So why has Apple chosen to make their Intel based portables non-upgradable, while leaving the processors in the Mini, iMac and Mac Pro removable?
I can't think of a good reason; if their strategy is to force people to move to new machines sooner rather than later, why not lock the processor on all the models?
There's only one theory I've come across, and I don't buy it: the fact that as notebook computers, the MacBook and MacBook Pro need the processor more securely attached than a desktop model would.
So, any other ideas as to why?
I can't think of a good reason; if their strategy is to force people to move to new machines sooner rather than later, why not lock the processor on all the models?
There's only one theory I've come across, and I don't buy it: the fact that as notebook computers, the MacBook and MacBook Pro need the processor more securely attached than a desktop model would.
So, any other ideas as to why?