johnnyjibbs said:
I just checked crucial.com. I looked up prices for Apple's PowerBook 12" (1 GHz) model and they were identical when using Safari, Firefox 1.0PR, Netscape 7.1 and Internet Explorer (Mac). I'm not convinced. (Note I'm using crucial.com/uk if that makes any difference).
That's interesting, and would seem to confirm what I've suspected for a while now - that this Crucial.com discriminatory pricing based on cookies thing is a total urban legend. I would imagine if it were true, I would have seen it referenced somewhere else on the web, yet every time I see it here and run a search in Google I get jack squat.
To the people who swear that Crucial is ripping them off, I ask the following questions:
1) How is it that Crucial.com is reading cookies from other websites, when generally speaking, only the site that placed the cookie can retrieve it? (this is handled by the browser)
Reference - note however that if you intend to bring up a possible browser flaw, it would have to exist across multiple browsers if the reports are true.
2) We can assume it is possible (well, it is in fact) to distinguish browsers based on the user agent string, it would be silly to argue otherwise. If this were the method used, how does one determine what price to give what browser? And why do something that would be so completely obvious? (see also next question)
3) Considering that price discrimination is generally quite illegal, why would a company go to so much trouble (and risk the potential consequences) to make a couple extra bucks? I am not arguing that this can not happen, or that it has not happened in the past - however, the question to ask is whether the benefits would really yield that much extra revenue for it to be worth it. I'm inclined in this case to say "no". Keep in mind the programming resources, etc, etc. that would have to be involved to maintain such a byzantine system (What cookies get set by other vendors? How do you keep track of changes to the other cookie formats?).
4) Have you considered that they were running a price update when all this funny business that everyone is harping on about happened, and it was simply random as to whether you got the updated price, or the old one? My websites distribute requests to multiple machines, so it's not altogether far fetched. Or it may even have been a simple glitch in the system. Think it's so far fetched? Not as much as "OMG! Teh Crucial.com is stealin' ma cookays!!!!!" IMNSHO.
5) Can you present incontravertible proof, in the form of screenshots - or, even better, a way to *consistently* reproduce this behavior? Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. If you have it, I suggest that you present your findings to the BBB or your Attorney General - as I've said above, price discrimination is illegal.
These are the questions I want answered before I buy into this "Crucial.com is riping you off with cookies" business.