I want to get the 13 inch MBP and I think the 9400 will suit my needs, but I'd hate to later find out that really needed that dedicated graphics card. I'm not a gamer. So, what are you doing that demands you have a dedicated graphics card?
Final Cut Studio 3
http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/specs/
The specs state a card supporting 256 MB VRAM and the other specs are rather mild. The mid-2009 13" will easily handle this with the 9400M.
You know there's a certain somebody on this forum you might like to meet.Also, there will be a lot more GPU accelerated software/plug-ins coming soon, so I'd like to be as "future proofed" as possible.
Yeah, but those are minimum requirements. I have the need... for speed.![]()
This is a good point though. If we start to see a lot of non-3D stuff starting to use the graphics card more with things like opencl, then it may be noticeable at some point in the future.Also, there will be a lot more GPU accelerated software/plug-ins coming soon, so I'd like to be as "future proofed" as possible.
But what happens whenthe screen becomes a holographic projection???
For video editing, you are not going to see much if any speed improvement with a better graphics card, at least currently. Video is 2D and is much more CPU bound.
Yeah, but the GPU is starting to be used for much more than 3D graphics. We will definitely see OpenCL being integrated more into programs such as Final Cut Pro.
There are already a number of applications that greatly increase video transcoding speed and rendering through the use of the GPU. A good example is the Nvidia Ion chipset which basically makes HD playback possible on an Atom system through GPU acceleration.
The 9400M does seem to begin to struggle a tiny bit with a 2560x1600 resolution display. The Stacks and Expose animations are not totally smooth but in general that is minor stuff.
That's probably because of the amount of memory available to the 9400m, and not because of the raw processing power of the gpu.