Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

npriess

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 12, 2008
101
0
Denmark
Hi,

I need to convert a bunch of .wma files for my itunes library.

I've chosen m4a over mp3 because I've heard the sound quality is better.

However, when I convert a 192kbit file using EasyWMA - the output is just 151kbit. When I tell iTunes (windows) to do the conversion, I get the selected 192kbit.

Why does the size and bitrate differ?
 
Hi,

I need to convert a bunch of .wma files for my itunes library.

I've chosen m4a over mp3 because I've heard the sound quality is better.

However, when I convert a 192kbit file using EasyWMA - the output is just 151kbit. When I tell iTunes (windows) to do the conversion, I get the selected 192kbit.

Why does the size and bitrate differ?

I know that this isn't an answer to your question but why don't you just use iTunes since it seems to do a better job?
 
I do. But im just curious and want to know why the conversion is not done in the same way :)
 
Hi,

I need to convert a bunch of .wma files for my itunes library.

I've chosen m4a over mp3 because I've heard the sound quality is better.

However, when I convert a 192kbit file using EasyWMA - the output is just 151kbit. When I tell iTunes (windows) to do the conversion, I get the selected 192kbit.

Why does the size and bitrate differ?

FYI, it's not wise to convert a lossy file format (WMA) to another lossy format (m4a). Your files are not going to sound very good.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.