Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
By moving to their own silicon Apple gains yet more control over the hardware makeup of their Macs. This makes it easier for them to deliver the features they want, on a schedule they can better predict (global pandemics aside), while leveraging proven, performant chips that allow them to further unify their software platforms (something they see as benefitting both developers and end users).

All of these are things Intel was unable to help them with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chabig
You're forgetting about battery usage and performance improvements. Apple Silicon draws much much less power, thus extending battery life and producing less heat (easier to build cooling systems or not to build at all).
 
  • Like
Reactions: chabig
Question:
"Why is Apple moving away from Intel architecture?"

Fishrrman's answer (and opinion):
CONTROL.
Control... over the hardware,
and
Control... over the USER.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: dannys1
To add on, Intel hasn't really kept up with its competitors. While Apple's A# series have gone to sub-10 nm processes while Intel's stuck at ~14 for years now. You could ask why not go to AMD? As others have said, using their own CPUs meaning more control on hardware, meaning better control of software, etc.
 
This is change number 3 that Apple has switched architecture: Motorola -> PowerPC -> Intel, and now their own Silicon. And each time Apple has gained from it. This time will be no different.
Forgot Apple II > Mac. Which was probably the messiest as there was little thought given to compatibility. A IIe compatibility card being made years later to help people transition. I'll just ignore Lisa > Mac.
 
Isn't this just going to cause a bunch of compatibility problems for little gain?
Lower power, higher performance, control over their own chip design, integration of co-processors etc. Apple were never going to get this with intel.
 
Apple has quietly scaled up it's own cpus to be as fast or faster than x86 cpus. And they work better in the laptops that are the majority of the Macs sold, better battery life and runs cooler. I think they could have transitioned a couple years ago (the iPad cpus were that good), but they waited until their CPUs are faster than Intels even under emulation. So outside of specialized things, there really isn't any compatibility issues.

The Apple CPUs turn the Macs into more of a computer 'appliance'... which has always been their goal. They've reached a point where anything you want the computer to do 'it just works' you don't have to worry about what CPU it has.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.