there's a lot of trickery involved with the i7 clock speeds and core/thread enabling/disabling that could cause one machine to do something different in a different situation.
Maybe it was cooler in the room when the 17" was run? Maybe the 15 has a smaller fan that keeps the turbo boost from reaching the same sustained ghz?
who knows. It's interesting, though.
Maybe the 15 has a smaller fan that keeps the turbo boost from reaching the same sustained ghz?
I think this is the best explanation. Perhaps Apple saw the heat problems of the 15" and underclocked it. Coincidentally, StefSSU mentioned the same thing a few minutes ago. It's definitely the turbo boost technology and its heat sensors.
What others are saying here is that the 15" reaches that target temperature sooner, so it starts stepping back down to the base clock speed sooner. I suspect that if you took the systems out of the case, and provided them with the exact same cooling, that they would behave exactly the same.
Gotcha.
So basically, for those planning to upgrade their 15" processors from 2.2GHz to 2.3GHz, they're better off buying a stock 17" 2.2GHz for almost the same cost without the BTO hassle. The stock 17" beats the pants out of an upgraded 15" due to heat dissipation. And you have a cooler machine as well.