Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

lockerc18

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 17, 2012
553
209
Battery life? Something else? It seems a shame to spend all this money and be limited on WiFi performance.
 
It seems a shame to spend all this money and be limited on WiFi performance.
TL:DR - cost, space requirements, power draw, viability. Maybe more stuff as well.

AC is a more complex tech, requires more circuitry, possibly also more antennas, more signal processing, leading to higher battery consumption and difficulty to fit into an already cramped device.

Besides, what are you going to download to the watch that is that space consuming that you need faster wifi? Even though wOS 5 supports limited web surfing it will still be limited, and you're not going to download huge files to your watch either. Anyway, since no watch thus far has supported 5GHz wifi bands you probably wouldn't get much higher performance with AC anyway; 2.4GHz band is often very crowded.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.