Lets face it, there are plenty of people out there (including some on this forum) who think collecting old Macs is pretty dumb. Most people are after the latest and greatest, and have no interest in obsolete systems. So why do you collect Macs instead of stamps, coins, or even classic cars?
The inclusion of classic (or vintage) cars is an interesting comparison, and also applies to things like vintage hi-fi, vintage cameras, vintage personal audio players, etc. I wouldn't consider stamp and coin collectors to be of the same 'breed', generally.
What happens is, when new technology appears it is usually priced in the premium bracket to reflect the development costs that went into it, the fact that it is 'new' and 'special' and typically the physical materials of the product and the construction quality are of a much higher quality early on in the product's life. These early examples are often the most interesting, both physically and historically.
Over time, the drive to lower production costs cause simplification of construction, cheaper materials, and so on. Ultimately the product becomes completely commoditized and essentially disposable. This has happened to most Wintel boxes.
I think Apple (computers) have been able to transcend this (and are therefore more collectable) because:
- They still come up with true innovations
- Great industrial design (though sometimes at the expense of performance and features, I cite the Cube as an example)
- Usually using high-quality materials, design and construction, especially on the high-end products
- Keeping prices firm so that they are always perceived to exist in a plane 'above' the common-or-garden Wintel box
- Carefully maintaining the 'cult' of Apple by the use of 'all of the above' and good marketing
I'm sure that there is significantly less interest in collecting Macs from the 'non-Jobs' era, which was notable for the machines becoming more standardized, PC-like construction, beige, etc. Or am I wrong?