The eMac concept won't go away: a CRT all-in-one is cheaper and more durable than an LCD. Schools and some consumers will want that kind of Mac for a long time to come. (I'm very happy with my own eMac.)
But I wouldn't be surprised to see the eMac NAME go away. It's always been confusing to people--more "iMac-like" than the iMac itself is, and the "e" isn't just for education anymore.
If the styling were updated along with a G5, it could just be an iMac again. There would be a CRT iMac in addition to the 17" and 20" LCD iMacs. All 3 would be nearly identical in specs, and look nearly the same from the front. Simpler for shoppers, and the "i" connection would be there to draw iPod users.
In fact, if any consumer desktop gets a non-iMac name, it should be the rumored headless Mac. That at least is outside the iMac tradition (and uses a G4). The eMac, with a G5 update, is firmly IN the iMac family.
So... anyone think the eMac name will die this month? I'm posting this for fun in case it happens
But I wouldn't be surprised to see the eMac NAME go away. It's always been confusing to people--more "iMac-like" than the iMac itself is, and the "e" isn't just for education anymore.
If the styling were updated along with a G5, it could just be an iMac again. There would be a CRT iMac in addition to the 17" and 20" LCD iMacs. All 3 would be nearly identical in specs, and look nearly the same from the front. Simpler for shoppers, and the "i" connection would be there to draw iPod users.
In fact, if any consumer desktop gets a non-iMac name, it should be the rumored headless Mac. That at least is outside the iMac tradition (and uses a G4). The eMac, with a G5 update, is firmly IN the iMac family.
So... anyone think the eMac name will die this month? I'm posting this for fun in case it happens