Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Ahboyd

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 13, 2008
130
65
51afPmwpyqL._SL1000_.jpg


Anker 36W
http://www.amazon.com/Charger-Adapt...ie=UTF8&qid=1430821527&sr=8-32&keywords=anker
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
It will be slow, as the voltage is 5v and I think the MacBook takes 14.5 from the official charger. So this will be the same as as iPad charger.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
I used to think a charger is a charger is a charger (and bought the cheapest one I could find with the same rating) until I read the post below. Bottom line, a charger is more than wattage or aesthetics.

Apple chargers on an o-scope

This is not directed at the specific products posted but I thought would be relevant on any discussion on chargers.
 
The macbook charger is 29 watt.



This puts out 60 watts (http://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-Famil...8&qid=1430885787&sr=8-17&keywords=usb+charger)



and this one 40 watts (http://www.amazon.com/40-Watt-Deskt...F8&qid=1430885885&sr=8-6&keywords=usb+charger)



Ideally I'd like to get a charger that can charge the macbook, a phone and a watch along with an external battery. (For travel purposes)


Those are also 5v chargers and so will be slow.

I doubt anything already released will work as they're all aimed at tablets.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
If you plugin a charger with a higher voltage, wouldn't that break the macbook? Or is that only with different Ampere?

Or is that an old phenomenon with legacy equipment which never happens anymore?
 
If the official charger produces 14.5 V, then none of these chargers are appropriate for charging the rMB.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.