Let's say Apple introduces a phone.
Would a phone sell well? Not because of it's quality, features, etc. But because of cell phone contracts. I, for example, can't leave my cell phone company for about a year and a half and I would have to buy the phone outright.
Phones are different, simply because of when and how you can buy them, right? People won't be as willing to get a new carrier or a new contract set up just for a phone. Carriers just don't give you as much leniency if you want a better price on your phone.
Also, the people that have iPods would most likely be the ones going after these phones. Well, if I have a working iPod, why would I need a new phone with similar features, in addition to my iPod? I could get a cheaper phone because my iPod already does the extra features of the iPhone (assuming there is no video chat). Sure, I could download music wirelessly, but would that be worth the cost of another iPod? I know that some people have multiple iPods, but not everyone (or the vast majority of people). Or is Apple going after new iPod owners.
Still though, I can go out and buy an iPod whenever without paperwork, activation fees, etc. Cell Phone carriers just don't give you that freedom (of buying a new phone whenever, for a reasonable price).
Could this be a reason the iTunes Motorola phones did bad? People didn't want an okay iPod when they already have one. I think Apple would have to have some really great features on this phone that set it away from iPods and cell phones.
Would the iPod transition into a phone, or would there be two different products?
I was interested in others' opinions on this.
applerocks
Would a phone sell well? Not because of it's quality, features, etc. But because of cell phone contracts. I, for example, can't leave my cell phone company for about a year and a half and I would have to buy the phone outright.
Phones are different, simply because of when and how you can buy them, right? People won't be as willing to get a new carrier or a new contract set up just for a phone. Carriers just don't give you as much leniency if you want a better price on your phone.
Also, the people that have iPods would most likely be the ones going after these phones. Well, if I have a working iPod, why would I need a new phone with similar features, in addition to my iPod? I could get a cheaper phone because my iPod already does the extra features of the iPhone (assuming there is no video chat). Sure, I could download music wirelessly, but would that be worth the cost of another iPod? I know that some people have multiple iPods, but not everyone (or the vast majority of people). Or is Apple going after new iPod owners.
Still though, I can go out and buy an iPod whenever without paperwork, activation fees, etc. Cell Phone carriers just don't give you that freedom (of buying a new phone whenever, for a reasonable price).
Could this be a reason the iTunes Motorola phones did bad? People didn't want an okay iPod when they already have one. I think Apple would have to have some really great features on this phone that set it away from iPods and cell phones.
Would the iPod transition into a phone, or would there be two different products?
I was interested in others' opinions on this.
applerocks