Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
dangit Blue stop beating me!

networking over wireless for programs would be ok i guess, fairly slow even on 802.11n. over ethernet would be ideal :)

is it slower than usb 2.0?

i can play fine over usb 2.0 on EHD
 
i have seen in game latency and all I know is that when the latency is high, the game is real slow.

I don't really know what latency means other than that though.

Is it a term to describe wireless Lag time?
 
Yes, a residential internet connection is slower than 802.11b. However, you wouldn't want to play over 802.11b, and no new Mac has shipped with 802.11b in years. The MacBook Pro comes with either 802.11g or 802.11n, depending which revision we're talking about here. They would be able to handle playing over wireless.
 
Yes, a residential internet connection is slower than 802.11b. However, you wouldn't want to play over 802.11b, and no new Mac has shipped with 802.11b in years. The MacBook Pro comes with either 802.11g or 802.11n, depending which revision we're talking about here. They would be able to handle playing over wireless.

i think i have to pay 1.99 to unlock the "n" on my macbook pro.

the limit is the router - need to get a newer router. my GF's is B, i'm sure - so ancient.

mine is G
 

no my numbers are actual world output in megaBytes, not megaBits as the rest of the whole world likes to say. its the same way as how hard drive companies say you have a 200Gb HD, even though it will only really be around 186.3GB...

his numbers are in bytes (B) rather than bits (b), also DoFoT9 shouldve used an uppercase "M". and we mustnt forgot real world speeds should we?

i didnt put the uppercase M in to show emphasis on the big "B", just trying to be as helpful as possible :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.