Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ucla95

macrumors member
Original poster
Mar 4, 2009
68
0
is the memory speed of 667 going to be a problem or does it not make much difference?
 
Hands up, who thinks that this is graphically intensive at all?

WoW was made four years ago. There is no Intel Mac that cannot run it.

maybe he's inquiring about how it will perform (fps wise).

You'd easy get 55-60 FPS on low settings. i play on fair/mid and get 40-50 most of the time on a 2.0 Ghz alu macbook. you can put all the settings on high and probably get 20-30 FPS at least. (this is all at native resolution)
 
It'll run quite well, but particularly if you intend to play the WOTLK expansion you might wanna turn some graphics settings down to avoid dipping into the single digit fps at hectic moments.
 
ty, didn't know if the 667 memory would impair this, that's what I needed to know. Plus I only play Burning Crusade, waiting for WOTLK to get cheaper first.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.