Check this out: CLICK
But does the video quality match the web app? That's the major difference between the two now.
Errm, how about you just watch the video? You're going to watch it to confirm anyway.How about you tell us what changed instead of linking us to a 4min video showing a bunch of other stuff?
But does the video quality match the web app? That's the major difference between the two now.
petvas said:But does the video quality match the web app? That's the major difference between the two now.
I don't see any difference in quality between the mobile version and the YouTube app.
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
Even in 3G?
kenypowa said:But does the video quality match the web app? That's the major difference between the two now.
It is kinda ridiculous that web app has better video quality than native app.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
On my iPod touch, the native app has higher resolution even with HQ on web app.
How about you tell us what changed instead of linking us to a 4min video showing a bunch of other stuff?
That's probably because in order for YouTube to work on the touch, you have to be connected to WiFi. If I remember correctly (I haven't used the stock app in a while), the iPhone's stock YouTube app's quality is pretty good on WiFi, it's just when you are on 3G it sucks. The Web App allows for "HQ" quality even when on 3G so it's much better then the crap the stock app produces on 3G.
Agree the YouTube App sucks on 3G but its the best on wifi. The YouTube web app is good on 3G but not as good as the native app on wifi. Does anyone why Google hasn't upgraded it?