Show me where i was talking about failure? I'm asking how this is a sustainable business model that's all. Quit smoking, pal.
How is a non sustainable business model anything OTHER than failure?
Example: If I take in less money than I bring in, I am "losing" money. "Lose" too much money, and my business will be forced to close. After closing, I realize since my business model was not sustainable, my business was a failure.
This isn't difficult.
While Grooveshark can't even get into the AppStore, you will most likely not see Spotify there. You will probably have to Jailbreak, just like for Grooveshark's mobile app.
And with Premium you can listen offline (save music, which is pretty handy on your phone) and the music is in higher quality
Not to mention offline playlists, which I use a lot - download as much music as I want over wifi, then listen to it wherever I want without having to sell a kidney to pay for 3G data
Now if only they'd finally introduce an iPad app....! According to the responses from their Twitter account they are "working on it"... but have been from quite a long time now - surely it can't be that hard?
While Grooveshark can't even get into the AppStore, you will most likely not see Spotify there. You will probably have to Jailbreak, just like for Grooveshark's mobile app.
Show me where i was talking about failure? I'm asking how this is a sustainable business model that's all. Quit smoking, pal.
How is a non sustainable business model anything OTHER than failure?
Example: If I take in less money than I bring in, I am "losing" money. "Lose" too much money, and my business will be forced to close. After closing, I realize since my business model was not sustainable, my business was a failure.
What I want to know is how is this a good deal for the artists? It seems like they are the real losers in this venture...
While Grooveshark can't even get into the AppStore, you will most likely not see Spotify there. You will probably have to Jailbreak, just like for Grooveshark's mobile app.
What I want to know is how is this a good deal for the artists? It seems like they are the real losers in this venture...
they are the losers anyway. They make nothing on any sale, whether digital or in a brick and mortar store. Quite sad actually.
What I want to know is how is this a good deal for the artists? It seems like they are the real losers in this venture...
I have as much concern about musicians, their royalties and payments as they have about my wages, if I want to listen to some music, I couldn't care less about what they do or don't get paid for it.
I subscribe and enjoy spotify, mainly listening through a sonos multi room system, not bothered where that money goes as I class it as good value.
What I want to know is how is this a good deal for the artists? It seems like they are the real losers in this venture...
Artists apparently already get almost nothing from music sales after the tens of middlemen take their massive cuts (*cough* labels, Apple *cough*), so I'm not too worried.
I understand this look awesome from consumer perspective, but how is this really a sustainable business model?
And already -1 for asking a simple question which has obviously no simple answer.
While Grooveshark can't even get into the AppStore, you will most likely not see Spotify there. You will probably have to Jailbreak, just like for Grooveshark's mobile app.
Artists apparently already get almost nothing from music sales after the tens of middlemen take their massive cuts (*cough* labels, Apple *cough*), so I'm not too worried.
This is very true...the artists that make money on selling music are the ones who record, produce and release it themselves. IE Radiohead, Pearl Jam.
You mean this? http://cl.ly/042g2d1D3S2l2V1t2D0h
I got it in the Dutch version! Dunno if it's in the US version, but I got it
While Grooveshark can't even get into the AppStore, you will most likely not see Spotify there. You will probably have to Jailbreak, just like for Grooveshark's mobile app.
Unlimited (desktop) $4.99, Premium (listen on your phone) $9,99