|
|
#251 | |
|
Quote:
That said, it takes so much time to find a good ROM, then they don't have all the tweaks you want, so you either need to patch it in yourself (and support it as the system updates) or look for another ROM. All in all, you could spend your entire life searching through all the slightly tweaked android variants. Once you've actually found one though, there's not a whole lot to do on the device. The google play store is still a list of "meh"s. The constant wave of fresh and exciting apps that you get on iOS just doesn't exist on Android. Yes, you can sideload apps, but outside of ridiculously easy piracy I haven't seen a case where that's essential. Maybe that's why the store is so barren. That's why I'm still with my iPad and my next phone will be an iPhone. You don't spend all your time tweaking how the device should work; you spend your time using it. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#252 | ||
|
Quote:
---------- Quote:
|
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#253 |
|
Especially when they come up with the same stupid gibberish of an argument like malware/spyware or Android users are poor.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Last I checked this thread is in the alternatives to iOS section. Yet people are surprised to see critisism?
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#255 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#256 | |
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() I kid
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#257 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#258 | |
|
Quote:
And if you equate criticism with hate, you may not get far in life. ---------- There are other, much easier ways to get around that. Freezing with Titanium backup and disabling in Android 4.0+ come to mind. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#259 |
|
You don't need to flash ROMs for that. Rooting and titanium backup are your friends. Also, if you are fine with the junk apps just hidden, you don't even need to root. Launchers like Nova allow you to hide apps.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#260 |
|
Well most Android phones now, you can hide apps using the default homescreen. I know you can on the HTC One series phone and the new line of Galaxy phones.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#261 |
|
Oh. I didn't know that. I never played around with stock launchers too much. It's not an issue for me either ways. I don't buy my phones from carriers.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#262 | |
|
Quote:
At least try to think it through. Michael |
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#263 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#264 | |
|
Quote:
- Customisation? Really? Yeah. Install a custom ROM. - Open-source? Really? Yeah. Install a custom ROM. You can get alternative launchers, but when I look on the Play store, I don't see an abundance of lots of unique launcher styles. What I see is: - One (or maybe two) major decent alternatives. Nova and ADW. The rest are too poor to even consider. - Between these two launchers, they work basically the same way (which is basically the same way the stock Android launcher). There are a few minor tweaks. Most of those tweaks are stupid things (like three-finger gesture shortcuts) that I can't be bothered with. Oh, and those tweaks have to be paid for, too (not complaining, just mentioning). - No integration. Even if I was interested in trying out a different launcher, there's a huge amount of fatigue here: you're going to have to re-add any widgets, home-screen shortcuts, dock shortcuts, everything. Most of the time it isn't worth it, because most of the launchers are small collections of tweaks over the stock launcher. In short, it's not a selling point. This is exactly why I switched from Windows to the Mac, and it's exactly what I loved about the Mac: instead of spending all day playing with the system internals to get it to work better, I could spend that time using the product to get stuff done. It's a masterful bit of design by Apple - by giving people less switches and toggles for menu colours or this or that, you do a couple of really great things: - You limit the number of things that can go wrong - You limit the number of things the user can distract themselves with People want things that are simple (obviously). All un-neccessary complexity removed. Apple have a good understanding of what that means (and in practice, it means less options and less "customisation", but it's harder work because you need to make something that people still find useful). |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#265 | ||||
|
Quote:
I don't share your views on different launchers. I decide which launcher I like and customize it once to meet my needs. I've been using Nova for quite some time and feel no need to switch. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Note that I'm not trying to convince you that Android is better than iOS, because that's very subjective. Android works better for me on phones, so I'll stick with it. You like iOS better so there's really no reason for you to change. But each have their selling points, otherwise people would only buy iPhones from the high-end spectrum of phones. |
|||||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#266 |
|
Both iOS6 and Android 4.x works just fine out the box when it comes to the basics. Both have the similar first time setup walk thru and the option to add your iCloud/Google account. The main noticeable difference is the level of customization Android has over iOS. This does not make Andriod any more difficult to use. Any difficulty with Android is usually setting up something that doesn't even exist in iOS, and it's by choice. Some users(especially in MR forums) claim Android to be more cumbersome because they try to duplicate exactly what they are used to on iOS. The term "Mac is not a PC" applies to Android and iOS too.
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#267 | ||
|
Quote:
That means options need to be kept limited to only the truly essential; if the list gets too long, you lose discoverability. You also need to be patient and look at other options for solving the same problems - it's hard to take options away after you've put them there (groups of people will inevitably feel that something's been taken from them and be indignant towards the new system). I do a lot of mobile UI design for my work, and this is the hardest part of it. You have limited screen space, so you need to be extremely selective. Doubly so because touch controls are larger. You need to agonise over every button and menu item. Perfection, as they say, is reached not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. Quote:
Interesting story: A friend of mine just posted on Facebook that she's going to get a Galaxy S3 as her next phone rather than an iPhone. Upon asking her, I just found out that she doesn't even know what an app is. She's never used the AppStore. Rather alarmingly, she's not the first iPhone-owner I've found who have been blissfully unaware of this whole app business. |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#268 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#269 |
|
@Saladinos,
Apple offers classes in their stores where people (lots of people) willingly and happily sign up to take. I always see people eager to learn how to use their shiny new device. Seriously, it's not that hard to implement a toggle or two here, or generally faster access to settings, or allowing attachments in email (this is not an entirely new concept), or any of the other things that would make iOS more usable. Especially as people become more smartphone and tech-literate in this day and age. You talk about keeping things simple. How is requiring 6 steps to turn on Private Browsing more simple than 2? How is taking 3-4 steps to turn on WiFi more simple than 1? How is not denying control over the keyboard dictionary (which then runs amok) more simple than allowing it? How is tapping into apps to get any information more simple than glancing at your home screen widget(s)? How is having to input your passcode every single time you unlock your iPhone more simple than allowing one to toggle it on when you need the security, and off when you don't (for example, at home, I toggle my lock screen off. Instant access to phone). I could go on and on. I'm sure others could chime in with plenty of examples too. There's no two ways about it. You're making excuses for iOS' shortcomings. And the notion that people won't get it or somehow can't learn a few more features here and there is the poorest excuse of them all. Hey, why does Apple bother adding new features at all, if they really fear people not knowing how to use them? Come on now. Last edited by onthecouchagain; Nov 28, 2012 at 12:35 AM. |
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#270 |
|
Not true either. You simply need to root the device to get access to the systems root directory. ROM, Kernal and bootloader can remain untouched. People prefer this option over installing custom roms, because it is easier.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#271 | |
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() IOS is stale, outdated, a bunch of dead icons lacking mobility or user preferenced data. This is just one of 3 launchers I can use on a whim. Apex is the other. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#272 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#273 |
|
Sorry but that just looks ridiculous and completely impractical. I feel as though I would think this is "cool" if I were a 6th grade boy...
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#274 | |
|
Quote:
![]() Doesn't require root nor is it not popular at all but its a choice you have. BTW there is irony to be found when you insult someone's choice by saying it looks like something a child would like.... |
||
|
|
5
|
|
|
#275 | |
|
Quote:
My pont wasn't about style, but what you can do. The myriad of option that you don't have, ;hat Android users do. I understand your need to lash out. That is what happens when envy kicks in. Ipbone is a POS, and more and more people are realizi g it. |
||
|
|
3
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.














Linear Mode
