Where did you read somebody would have to get a new number?
In several posts on this thread alone.
Where did you read somebody would have to get a new number?
The sender would obviously know if you received the iMessages or not. It shows a little "delivered" message at the bottom right when the recipient gets the iMessage. It's really quite obvious.
I fully 100% support this lawsuit! And it's a real shame that Tim Cook's Apple requires lawsuits to get them to do the right thing. This would have been fixed immediately under Steve Jobs' Apple.
Suing over a software bug is stupid, there is nothing you can say to sway my opinion. Get angry? Yes. Switch platforms? Yes. Sue? No.
Seriously, suing a company for undelivered messages? Get a grip.
Have you read any software EULA? There is no responsibility to the company.
The damage would also be that people might not be switching to competitors' phones to avoid the problem.
I think that is hilarious.
----------
The sender would obviously know if you received the iMessages or not. It shows a little "delivered" message at the bottom right when the recipient gets the iMessage. It's really quite obvious.
It's been going on since 2011. That would be actually three years.
----------
No. It says that there are other things in OS X and iOS that need priority for existing customers, not former ones.
Better alternative at this point after years of Apple ignoring the issue and without any progress so far? And there you go, it's that simple (even if unfortunate).You know what, this whole "suing culture" is society's downfall.
Seriously, suing a company for undelivered messages? Get a grip.
Everybody's just after quick cash these days, hence this blame culture that has befallen us.
And plenty of reports overs the years and and even now that a lot of people can't get it resolved easily even after contacting Apple. So what now?Apple fix this issue in 24 hours for my business phone....what the big deal..I bet the didn't even call for support...and I bet this is the type of user that agrees to the terms of service without actually reading it
It's fun to keep on ignoring the actual issue and comment about things that don't actually deal with it.Geez it's right there in front of you in B/W. How difficult is this to comprehend. To turn off iMessage is simple. This lawsuit is just ridiculous and for the lazy crybabies who sue because they have to lift a finger or burn precious calories to use their brain.
https://www.apple.com/ios/messages/
If youre a texter, youll love Messages on iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. Now they all come with iMessage, a service thats an even better kind of texting. Because its free for you and anyone texting over Wi-Fi using an iOS device or Mac with iMessage. And its unlimited.* So say as much as you want.
Those who think that conveniently ignore the fact that this screws up current customers too who send messages to some who have changed phones thinking everything is fine (because Apple said they can figure out when to send iMessages and when to send SMS/MMS and the user doesn't need to worry about it) but their messages are never actually delivered. Quite convenient for those people to leave that out in their very thoughtful comments.So people really think that Apple shouldn't do anything to their "former customers" who still might be using other Apple products even if they are not using iPhones anymore? Yeah, screw those guys, who cares if those people won't be buying any new Macs or iPads after being treated like garbage by Apple.
While this may be an issue, it is not lawsuit worthy. If you knew a thing or two about contract law, you would realize the absurdity of this case.
The issue I have here is that people feel so ****ing entitled to a functioning service that if it fails, they feel they deserve monetary compensation. That is not only wrong, it is legally bulli*****. No one is forcing iMessage down your throat. No one is forcing an iPhone down your throat. YOU bought it. Your get what you paid for. Deal with it.
No, its a bug. Autodesk had a bug in Maya making it unusable on a Mac with certain ATI cards for 4 years. Did I sue Autodesk? No I switched to another program.
Apple had an OpenGL bug since the beginning of Mavericks that made one of my softwares really laggy. Did I sue? No. I filed bug reports (something I guarantee almost no one with this bug did) repeatedly and the problem got fixed.
Suing over something so silly is ridiculous. There is no spin you can make to justify it.
Pretty sure I'm making the same point there.
I'm an old man and not an anything boy. Please point be to where I said I would be ok with it. I'm fact, if you read what I wrote, I said it is bad, petty, annoying and so on. My point, that you missed, is that none of that seems to me to be a "right" to sue, as it's just a limitation in their service. Intentional or not.
----------
Maybe it's a cultural difference, but the whole lawsuit thing seems over the top to me. I'd hope, if it was intentional, some bad press would do the trick.
Why the long standing problem of the iMessage not working after quitting Apple service is on all the sites now.
It had to be re-popularized for the lawsuit.
I hope the people lose.
PETTY PETTY PETTY.
Despite what might or might not be in that, a company is on the hook for issues it creates and ignores. Can't excuse yourself from negligence through some agreement.
For those that are interested, you can read the actual filed complaint here >> http://www.scribd.com/doc/224611176/IMessage-Complaint
Uh, there are other things that people need to use iOS and OSX for besides messages that Apple needs to put a priority to. And hey, watch your tone. It's just a discussion here, you insulting me starts to tell me things about you. I have not posted an insult or a put-down towards you, so remain civil or look for someone else to throw your petty insults towards.
Its not a limitation of Apple's service. The affected users are not using Apple, they are receiving texts via their Telco's SMS system, and via the Telco SMS system that the iPhone sender uses.
If the issue was Apple iMessage service, Apple users can turn it off, this thread is not about the ability of iMessage to operate, its about Apple servers that are NOT being used, are blocking Telco to Telco SMS
----------
Can't you read?? Its NOT about iMessage not working after quitting Apple service, its about iMessage WORKS after quitting Apples service, so when you send a text from an iPhone to an Android, Apple uses iMessage, so the recipient doesn't get the text. Its only a bug, but three years on, and still a bug. In effect your Telcos SMS (text) service is not allowed to operate as Apple is a roadblock in the middle, even though Apples service is not in use
----------
To expand on this, be interesting to look at the Telcos EULA, I am sure there will be something about not interfering with the Telco's services, SMS being one of them. This is exactly what this issue it. Its nothing to do with iMessage, its Apple affecting Telco to Telco SMS
----------
I copied below the pertinent comment. I wish people would stop talking about an iMessage fault, the issue is Telco to Telco SMS (nothing to do with Apple or iMessage) is affected by Apple iMessage servers. The key below is that Apple affected the ability of Telco customers to use the Telco provided SMS (text) service.
Unbeknownst to Plaintiff and the putative class members,however,once they switched from anAppleiPhoneoriPadto a non-Apple device for their wireless serviceneeds
, Apples iMessages
and Message service andapplication still retained text messages thatwere directed at thesepersons from other Apple users,and failed to deliver these text messagestothe putative class members aslong as theseputative class memberscontinued using a non-Appledevice. In this manner, Apple tortiously interferedwiththe contract for cellular service betweenthese putative class members and their cellular telephone carrier in thatApple
s actionspreventedthe subscribers fromreceiving all of their text messages,as they were entitled to obtain throughtheircellularwirelessservicecontracts.
----------
Priority. Who decides that? What is your priority is not others priority.
I don't feel there is a need to fix iMessage, as iMessage is not at fault. Aside from the occasional server issue, iMessage seems to work well. This thread is not about an iMessage operational bug for Apple users who choose to use iMessage, its about the inability of two individuals to send a text message from one telco to another telco. And whose users do not use iMessage.
Geez it's right there in front of you in B/W. How difficult is this to comprehend. To turn off iMessage is simple. This lawsuit is just ridiculous and for the lazy crybabies who sue because they have to lift a finger or burn precious calories to use their brain.
https://www.apple.com/ios/messages/
If youre a texter, youll love Messages on iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. Now they all come with iMessage, a service thats an even better kind of texting. Because its free for you and anyone texting over Wi-Fi using an iOS device or Mac with iMessage. And its unlimited.* So say as much as you want.
Apple is not blocking anything. If the sender sends as an SMS, the SMS goes through.
The fact that Apple says they themselves can figure out when it's appropriate to send an iMessage or an SMS and then they incorrectly determine that for numbers that shouldn't have iMessage enabled anymore (and thus mislead the sender that they sent their message without any issues, and never actually deliver it to the recipient), well, that's a problem.Apple is not blocking anything. If the sender sends as an SMS, the SMS goes through.
Easy solution: Don't switch to Android.
You do realize that this bug makes it "impossible" to switch platforms, and it only affects those who have already decided to switch platforms?
And what is your suggested method of escalating an issue between consumers and a corporation that has not been addressed in three years?
I know exactly what the bug is and Im curious how many people actually contacted Apple verses cry on a forum about it.
It's silly that you guys think suing is the answer. That's the American mindset for sure. Sue sue sue.
Plenty of people contacted Apple, some got the help they needed others didn't. The issue exists and has been there for a long time without a resolution and no real progress after all this time. So, while a lawsuits would be unfortunate for something like this, what's hour solution to get Apple to address it properly for everyone once an for all?I know exactly what the bug is and Im curious how many people actually contacted Apple verses cry on a forum about it.
It's silly that you guys think suing is the answer. That's the American mindset for sure. Sue sue sue.
What's your solution as far as gettingn Apple to pay attention and finally address this issue after all these years?It's beyond silly. It's the I'm entitled to money because I'm inconvenienced by text messaging whiners.
I know exactly what the bug is and Im curious how many people actually contacted Apple verses cry on a forum about it.
It's silly that you guys think suing is the answer. That's the American mindset for sure. Sue sue sue.
It's beyond silly. It's the I'm entitled to money because I'm inconvenienced by text messaging whiners.