I think I'll trust world renowned architects like Foster and Partners over posters on MacRumors.
To be honest, I would not for a moment
When it comes to art ?
Designing for Looks, and/or to be different.
Then looking at another type of building that's designed for function and practicality, you may well find the two are totally at odds with each other.
Is a doughnut the best use of space?
Well no, I think we can all agree on that one.
Does it look pretty / interesting, well, yes, I guess one must say it will look nice, with tree's in the middle etc etc, it's going to look good.
Is it the most practical shape to get from one area of the building to another, errr, again I think we can say that's a BIG no on that one.
Of course, none of this makes it wrong.
I guess as long as they have anticipated into the future their needs when it comes to people there who need space, then all good.
Fact remains, a more conventional building, in the same area of land, would of given those people most space to work in, and quicker access from area to area.
There is a reason most buildings are not built this shape
Having said that........
I myself would like a home built like this.
Not perhaps a doughnut as most home plots are not circular, but I'd like a home that had it's back all the way around my boundary line, following the shape of my home plot, and all windows facing in, and my garden in the middle.
Yes, it would be a bloody PITA to walk from say one area to the other. Meaning I have to walk all the way around, or cross the middle, which is fine if the weather is good.
But it would give me maximum privacy and make the best use of my garden space.
So I personally would forgo practicality for privacy, but then again it would be for me as my home, not for a business.