WiiDSmoker said:512 MB of RAM is a let down. A bigger device should be more powerful than a phone...
ya, that has to be wrong. I think the NYTimes review is mistaken. It also contradicts Macworld's review. I've added a note.
arn
Every review I have read has said something along the lines of: WOW it really feels much lighter and thinner and sexier
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Umm it is more powerful. RAM isn't everything.
That would still be wrong. Every review is saying 1 megapixel shooter, same cameras as the iPod Touch 4.NYT had to make a mistake... I'm sure they meant .5 megapixels..
Any news if the 3G model (for AT&T) is SIM-unlocked?
It's because he gave it a 9/10 review, which is absolute nonsense. It should be 8/10 max.The Engadget comments have predictably exploded.
The usual complaints that Topolsky is an Apple shill, the Xoom is so much better, etc etc.
Honestly, I don't know why I even bother reading the comments on Apple reviews anymore. It's just depressing.
Take some time to learn about digital cameras. More megapixels does not mean better pictures.Wait, so the camera on the back is 5 megapixels? Why is everyone complaining then?
That would still be wrong. Every review saying 1 megapixel shooter, same cameras as the iPod Touch 4.
The NYTimes always either gets things wrong or just outright lies.
What do you expect, the ipad camera is not that great. it is not going you replace your Nikon D3 or Canon 5Dm2. Its like saying your butter knife won't cut your steak so its a crappy knife
The Engadget comments have predictably exploded.
The usual complaints that Topolsky is an Apple shill, the Xoom is so much better, etc etc.
Honestly, I don't know why I even bother reading the comments on Apple reviews anymore. It's just depressing.
I know, anyone who expected the iPad 2 camera to be as powerful as your cheaper and smaller iPhone must be completely delusional.
It's because he gave it a 9/10 review, which is absolute nonsense. It should be 8/10 max.