I'm not asking for them to drop the current single design, just to add some different options.That's for Apple to worry about, not me. Don't think they don't read these forums and see all the calls for round faces and a thinner design. It'll get a redesign when they decide it's time. I'm just happy that my Watch will not look outdated so quickly. I have over $1,000 invested in two apple watches and bands.
I think the key question is "do you want 4+ days before a charge and be as bulky as the Gesr S3?" Most will say NO. You also can't get thinner and last 4 days and LTE... yet.That's for Apple to worry about, not me. Don't think they don't read these forums and see all the calls for round faces and a thinner design. It'll get a redesign when they decide it's time. I'm just happy that my Watch will not look outdated so quickly. I have over $1,000 invested in two apple watches and bands.
Good point. Then others will complain that Apple needs less versions. I would like to see a round face but it can't be larger or it is a money loser for Apple.I'm not asking for them to drop the current single design, just to add some different options.
Sleep tracking is already there by several apps and two are really good and burn 5% of battery. Even with my series 0 it would only burn 8-10% battery after 18 months. Charge when I shower is all it needs.I'm on Series 0, so will be a potential upgrade candidate for Series 3 at the end of this year. But my battery life is fine. I can get well into the second day as long as I take the watch off at night. I would like sleep tracking though.
Tim: GrumpyHell ! Just another leak !
Phil and Greg must be behind this. Can't be Joni who's just shaving off batteries to make things thinner !
Phil: Butt, I'm secure. Don't even speak Chinese.
Greg: And I have abruptly stopped to disclose any idea's. Privacy !
Angela: Can't be me. I can only accomodate a thinner hockey-puck than we currently have.
Tim: So decisionmaking stalls again. Then it is up to me to decide.
All: And what will you do ?
Tim: As I said ! I am on the peddles now and let's keep it that way ...
_____
I use the same app and it works great and I wake 8 hours later with 95% battery. So many posts asking for sleep tracking when it is already there and has zero impact on battery. AutoSleep is worth the $3 and doesn't require an app installed or running on the Watch. The stats are gathered in the health app all the time your sleep. Movement and HR is the key.Doubtful .. there are already plenty of quality sleep tracking apps and the battery life of the Series 2 is more than sufficient to wear while sleeping. I wear it while sleeping every night and also use it to track a workout of an hour or more each day with GPS.
I only ever charge mine in the morning while taking a shower/getting dressed and every now and then before bed.
Personally, I am glad to give me wrist a break for an hour of so each day without wearing the watch. Not sure what is gained by more battery life unless it is to power more features.
Do people really want to wear a watch for more than a day without taking it off? When you take it off, just drop it on the charger, just as easy as dropping it anywhere else. For the most part it is fully charged an hour later.
[doublepost=1483457118][/doublepost]
Why? Do you plan to wear it for 3 to 4 consecutive days without ever taking it off? If it last 23 hours a day, that is more than sufficient for sleep tracking. The Series 2 battery lasts much longer than that most of time.
Great sleep tracking data from AutoSleep...
View attachment 681533 View attachment 681534
Battery improvement is by far the most needed feature. Until they make a watch that can reliably last for a whole weekend away from home without a charger then the battery life is more or less useless. Less than a week is almost as useless. But hey, if Apple says "a day if you're careful and don't check the time or use too many features" and don't mind remembering to bring the charger every time you're away from home overnight, then I'm sure that there'll be plenty of people who agree.Apple Watch series 2's battery life is super good already. I can easily use the watch 2 days without charging. I stretched it to 2.5 a few times too, and maybe can last for 3 days (with power reserve mode)...
Thanks but no thanks if it's just battery improvements.
there was no reason to upgrade from the series 1can't see the need to upgrade my series 2 not if the design is the same
im happy with my 1st gen, until we see some design changes, or at least some radical app changes, that this watch can't do.
I think the key question is "do you want 4+ days before a charge and be as bulky as the Gesr S3?" Most will say NO. You also can't get thinner and last 4 days and LTE... yet.
I prefer the current shape and size. Bigger would sell less like Gear products. No one or the minority want bigger and that is proven by the number of units sold by competitors even with round and LTE and longer battery.
[doublepost=1483459682][/doublepost]
Good point. Then others will complain that Apple needs less versions. I would like to see a round face but it can't be larger or it is a money loser for Apple.
[doublepost=1483459777][/doublepost]
Sleep tracking is already there by several apps and two are really good and burn 5% of battery. Even with my series 0 it would only burn 8-10% battery after 18 months. Charge when I shower is all it needs.
Better battery life would surely attract new Apple Watch buyers.
Most people I know balk at 1 day battery life and it puts them off purchasing.
Last 10 days I've been wearing a Samsung Gear S3 and it genuinely averages 3.5 days on a single charge. The hardware is incredible, only problem is a lack of third party apps.
Better battery life would surely attract new Apple Watch buyers.
Most people I know balk at 1 day battery life and it puts them off purchasing.
Last 10 days I've been wearing a Samsung Gear S3 and it genuinely averages 3.5 days on a single charge. The hardware is incredible, only problem is a lack of third party apps.
there was no reason to upgrade from the series 1