If they are redisigning iTunes 11, was it worth it to move iTunes 10.4 to 64 bit?
Because that was the only goal then, that's how all started, but things change and it's not only about that now.
Please can I have an example? Almost all cross platform software stinks.If other cross platform package creators can create similar experiences on similar performing platforms
Spotify is awesome. Sure there are periodic advertisements, but there's also almost no buffering at all.
That is merely a 64-bit installer, the 32-bit installer is not compatible with 64-bit Windows. The client is still 32-bit.
Please can I have an example? Almost all cross platform software stinks.
That instantly rules it out for me then..
I thought that Itunes on Windows includes a USB class driver for Idevice support - and that driver must be an x64 driver on x64 systems.
It isn't really necessary to have an x64 "installer" per se - in fact the majority of installer programs are x86. x86 installers run on both x64 and x86, and can choose whether to install x86 or x64 binaries as appropriate.
The majority of kits seem to be for both x86 and x64 Windows - both sets of binaries are in the kit, and the x86 installer selects the right files for the system on which it is running.
Remember this? Remember how much people whined when it was dropped!
The current iTunes works for me, and suits my purposes, a redesign is always nice. I just hope they don't go along the route they displayed with iCal
iTunes has an identity crisis, and it's only getting worse. Its name and icon suggest music, but these days I go there for so much more. Movies. Podcasts. Apps. iPhone settings. Add to that books soon, and it becomes more painfully obvious that something must change.
Just thinking out loud, but I'd love to see either one app that combines all sort of media consumption in a way that doesn't trivialize everything other than music with its name, and maybe a separate app to deal with device and cloud syncing. Heck, merge the media consumption into Safari. I feel like I'm doing the same thing in Safari and iTunes most of the time anyway, when it comes to consuming digital content.
This just kinda hurts my head. I'm done venting now.
Lets hope it gets some color back. It's looking quite pale ... euh gray.
On Windows, iTunes is really bloated. It takes ages to load on my pc, and sometimes when synchronizing it freezes and takes almost all CPU. Syncing also takes way too long. I synced an iPad, detached it, then realized I wanted another app on it, connected it again and suddenly it begun transferring bought items again! Nothing changed in that mere minute.
i hope they dont split it up, its already annoying having iPhoto always pop up even if u just want to sync music
I dont really know the details of it, I just know if I download the 32-bit installer and attempt to run it, an error pops up saying the program is incompatible.
Where's the bloat, again? Safari and WebProcess are FAR worse in terms of bloat, ram hogging, and resource hogging. So if you have iTunes problems in the future, check to see if Safari is taking over your computer first. Getting off my soapbox now.
Ooh, nice one! I didn't notice that until you pointed that out!
NO. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO. I don't WANT to have to go to this app for this function, and another app for another function. What I like about iTunes currently is its all-encompassing function, the "Walmart of apps", if you will. If I wish to sync my iPhone, I only need to go to ONE place, not 150 different places depending upon what I want to sync to my iPhone or iPad.
Yes, it's got its problems, but if iTunes 11 is the LONG-awaited rewrite of iTunes with a plugin architecture that makes everything work seamlessly WITHOUT having to split up iTunes into separate apps, then everyone will be happy and we'll all go in 6 months, "Why'd we want iTunes to be in separate apps, again?" Mark my words.
BJ
There are um, paid options. Spotify is brilliant in the whole two weeks I've been using it. The sparse advertisements don't bother me, and paying $5 a month for the great service would remove the ads altogether.
Can we please stop the separate app thingy? In general maybe it makes sense to have more than one app, if you are just starting now. Now it doesn't make sense to split one app into 100 apps and it will not remove bloat, because after iTunes went 64 bit cocoa there isn't any. If you have huge library it's whole other problem, because you know it takes time, CPU and RAM to load big library and there is nothing you can do about it.
Multiple apps open is the current situation, whether we need or want it or not.
If you absolutely must have access to all of iTunes' current myriad features, then of course the status quo is perfect for you. For the rest of us who don't buy from iTunes, we do not need that bloat within slowing down the application and hogging focus while it tries to contact the mothership.
If they could make iTunes more modular so that we could permanently disable those parts we don't care for, then I wouldn't care that the application was so monolithic.
Ok, what is the purpose of iTunes now then. Almost every other app Apple does you can sum up in a couple of words:
Safari - internet
iPhoto - photos
iMovie - video
Pages - Word processing
Numbers - spreadsheets
Keynote - presentations
Mail - email
Address Book
iCal - Calendar
Mac App Store - buy apps
Then we have iTunes which is music, video, podcasts, ringtones, social networking, syncing, music store etc. etc.