Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So you'll be using your card...

No need for future tense. I am using my card.

----------

All it would really take is for the credit card companies - which are on board with Apple Pay - to say "you either accept payment by our cards through Apple Pay, or you don't accept payment by our cards at all". I imagine the NFC terminals would be back on in CVS and Rite Aid the next day, and be getting rapidly installed almost everywhere ASAP.

It seems that this will become a moot point next year, when merchants are required to support "chip and PIN" transactions or face significantly increased fees from the CC companies. If "chip and PIN" works, so should other NFC payment solutions.

I imagine that would be a foolish move and would only move more retailers to the consortium.
 
CurrentC is even worse than I thought

http://techcrunch.com/2014/10/25/currentc/

And this:

"If I’m reading this right, and I think I am, these retailers who are shutting down their NFC payment systems are validating that Apple Pay is actually working, that people are actually using it. And remember, it only works with the month-old iPhones 6. Think about what happens a year or two from now when a majority of iPhones in use are Apple Pay enabled.

Think about what they’re doing. They’re turning off NFC payment systems — the whole thing — only because people were actually using them with Apple Pay. Apple Pay works so well that it even works with non-partner systems. These things have been installed for years and so few people used them, apparently, that these retailers would rather block everyone than allow Apple Pay to continue working. I can’t imagine a better validation of Apple Pay’s appeal.

And the reason they don’t want to allow Apple Pay is because Apple Pay doesn’t give them any personal information about the customer. It’s not about security — Apple Pay is far more secure than any credit/debit card system in the U.S. It’s not about money — Apple’s tiny slice of the transaction comes from the banks, not the merchants. It’s about data.

They’re doing this so they can pursue a system that is less secure (third-party apps don’t have access to the secure element where Apple Pay stores your credit card data, for one thing), less convenient (QR codes?), and not private.

I don’t know that CVS and Rite Aid disabling Apple Pay out of spite is going to drive customers to switch pharmacies (Walgreens is an Apple Pay partner), but I do know that CurrentC is unlikely to ever gain any traction whatsoever."
 
Okay guys I'm getting confused, I need a list of all the companies we hate.

We hate
Samsung
Google
Microsoft
Bose
CVS

Who else, I can't keep up.

I forgot U2
 
You realize that MCX is a consortium of these retailers. They don't have to be in the consortium. I'm not defending them - but at the same time, these retailers made an agreement to "unionize" against the credit card companies. So if the "rules" of being in the consortium is that they do x or y, that's on them. They CHOSE that.

And you realize that Apple and Google don't have to support MCX and CurrentC.
 
I don't shop there but I suspect some will stop shopping there now, like they did Rite Aid. Just why would you stop money coming into your business?

If I were to guess, it would be cost. Instead of just having to pay Visa or Mastercard, they now also have a fee to pay Apple or Google.

A lot of retailers don't take American Express, not because they don't want to "stop money", but it's part cost of allowing them and how long it takes for AMEX to pay them.
 
And you realize that Apple and Google don't have to support MCX and CurrentC.

Ok - so? It should be obvious that it would mostly affect Apple users since they can't side load unless jailbroken. Further - CurrenC could just use a web app.

On the flip side - Apple and google could work with CurrenC and demand a percentage of any transaction made through the network. But I doubt that's going to happen.
 
If I were to guess, it would be cost. Instead of just having to pay Visa or Mastercard, they now also have a fee to pay Apple or Google.

A lot of retailers don't take American Express, not because they don't want to "stop money", but it's part cost of allowing them and how long it takes for AMEX to pay them.

As already stated, the banks cover the fees, if any, not the merchants.

Recap:
- Banks are on-board as NFC with TouchID and tokenization is [currently] the most secure system available and will save them money long term by not having to re-issue cards, cover fraudulent transactions, etc.
- MCX and participating merchants sell consumer data to marketers (retailers get a cut), something that cannot be done with anonymous tokenization Apple Pay transactions

I'm sure I'm forgetting more, but that's the gist of it. :)
 
Ok - so? It should be obvious that it would mostly affect Apple users since they can't side load unless jailbroken. Further - CurrenC could just use a web app.

On the flip side - Apple and google could work with CurrenC and demand a percentage of any transaction made through the network. But I doubt that's going to happen.

you going to explain to my mom how to jailbreak or create a web app? good luck...
 
you going to explain to my mom how to jailbreak or create a web app? good luck...

create a web app?

You don't create a web app. You go to a website address.

Regardless - it's possible that your mom will just have to use a credit card or cash. OH NO!
 
Ok - so? It should be obvious that it would mostly affect Apple users since they can't side load unless jailbroken. Further - CurrenC could just use a web app.

On the flip side - Apple and google could work with CurrenC and demand a percentage of any transaction made through the network. But I doubt that's going to happen.

Skipped part where something you said about jailbreaking, side loading, something.

Let me turn on my phone, open the web, wait it for load, then do all the additional processes CurrentC wants me to do...

On the flip side- CVC could have continued to allowed NFC payments which have worked on Google Wallet for a long time. iPhone users have just gotten NFC, I know some Android friends that are pissed that stores are not allowing their Galaxy, Nexus, and HTCs to accept Google Wallet.
 
If I were to guess, it would be cost. Instead of just having to pay Visa or Mastercard, they now also have a fee to pay Apple or Google.

A lot of retailers don't take American Express, not because they don't want to "stop money", but it's part cost of allowing them and how long it takes for AMEX to pay them.

No fee retailers are not paying any fees. It's the banks paying Apple
 
And with microchips in my credit cards, I have yet to see a terminal at a POS that will utilize those microchips.

Have you ever been to any major retailer? If you have, you have seen a POS with that option. There is a slot on the bottom of the card scanner.

Right now, not sure if it's every Walmart but all local ones around me force use if the card has the chip.

----------

No fee retailers are not paying any fees. It's the banks paying Apple

Fees roll down to everyone. They aren't directly paying, but they are paying.
 
The other irony (for lack of better word) are those people (and not saying they are on this thread) that mocked or laughed at anyone who thought google pay was convenient or of real benefit because really -how many stores could you use it now will "only" use Apple pay and only patronize stores that offer it as a payment method.

And no - I am not arguing that Google did it first or better or is more or less secure. I just find it amusing that NFC payment wasn't a big deal to the Apple community for the most part... until it was.

I admit to not realizing the benefit of NFC until well after Google introduced Google Wallet. But I can admit my mistake, and see that Google was right all along to support NFC technology.

Of course, now that Apple is using NFC, it doesn't matter anymore. Inexplicably, plain old magnetic stripe credit cards are perfectly fine again, and anybody wanting to use NFC is a fanboy. I doubt people will admit that their sudden change of heart has to do with their hatred of Apple.

me worship at the altar of Apple, really??? Have you not been reading this thread?

1) this not just an Apple matter, but a Google wallet matter.
2) this about NFC, so again just NOT Apple.
3)Currentc takes YOUR CHECKING ACCOUNT INFO AND BANK ROUTER INFO AND SAVES IT IN THE CLOUD. No credit cards are involved. It is a security and privacy issue and a play to injure Visa and Mastercard at the expense of the consumer.
4) You have less rights under the law if money is stolen from your CHECKING ACCOUNT. Basically, you are SOL if you money is stolen from your checking account.
5)The merchant gets access to whatever you buy to shove ads in your face. Other for inventory purposes, they should not have to than data .... unless you are stupid enough to sign up for CurrentC.

NFC doesn't care how, what, where or when you buy things. That is good for the consumer, bad for the merchant. CurrentC is all about the merchant, not the consumer.

Doesn't matter what CurrentC is about and who is behind it. They're going against Apple, and that's good enough for the people around here!
 
Well I guess it's time to stop shopping at CVS and transfer my prescriptions to Walgreens. I never liked that CVS was dating mining my credit card info, so this really is enough to get me to drop them entirely.
 
create a web app?

You don't create a web app. You go to a website address.

Regardless - it's possible that your mom will just have to use a credit card or cash. OH NO!

Actually she quite good in using the debit card. The credit card is for emergencies. She will read about CurrentC and ask about it and we expound on its evils.

And yes, you can still create a web app to put on the Home page. I have 3-4 for websites I frequent on a daily basis.
 
Doesn't matter what CurrentC is about and who is behind it. They're going against Apple, and that's good enough for the people around here!


Yes, it does matter they are about and who is behind it. I don't give a crap if they are going against Apple. It is anti-consumer. Apple just happens to be involved.
 
This is what loses companies business. People fail to understand some industries don't move until Apple gets involved - mobile music, music downloads, smart phones, etc.

This alternative to Apple Pay will be a failure like many alternatives to Apple services. CVS, along with some others, will miss out on sales because they'd prefer to "do it their way." Oh well.

Some fail to realize that the world doesn't revolve around Apple either.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.