Kaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
!!!!
Kaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
!!!!
Rumors of the mini's demise have been greatly exaggerated. But, I think they are true.
It's primary purpose for existence when introduced was to encourage switchers, by not forcing them to buy new peripherals (BYOKM). That the mini took on a life of it's own was perhaps an unintended result.
The only reason to have it around is to have an inexpensive computer coupled with a larger monitor. But with the mini at $600 and a 20" monitor at $600 you are likely to go with an iMac and get better graphics and a larger hard drive. (I understand you can buy a less expensive monitor from another vendor, but that doesn't help Apple).
I am using a mini right now, because I didn't like the glossy screen of the iMac and had an Apple cinema display already. The mini is also useful as a inexpensive server or development machine, but these uses are most likely not producing the numbers Apple wants to see.
Apple makes their money by keeping a simplified product line and keeping it around for a long time. That's how they get 30% of the money with only 10% of the computers. This also allows them to spend a lot of engineering time to come up with stuff like the Unibody enclosure. iMacs and MacBooks are the money makers for Apple and they have publicly stated again and again their lack of interest in the low margin budget PC. Better to let Dell and HP fight over the scraps.
As the economy tanks, it would seem like the appropriate response for Apple to enter this market, but that just hasn't been Apple's approach. Remember the last downturn and Apple's response? They said they would innovate through it by investing in research. That strategy worked brilliantly and set them up for the last four years of rapid growth. Their strategy is always counterintuitive; I expect them to drop the mini and eventually the white MacBook and have basically three Mac products: iMac, MacBook Pro (MacBook is a MacBook Pro now), and the PowerMac.
You may not like it, but that's what my crystal ball says.
If it hasn't sold very well, I say kill it.
The Mac Book is the new switch machine, walk around any computer shop and you will notice how small the desktop section is unless you are a business looking to buy several hundred machines etc.. Laptops are in like it or not.
Object-X said:Another problem with updating the mini just occurred to me. Apple stated clearly that they were moving their entire product line to the mini display port.
If Apple were to update the mini or redesign it, that would mean adding a display port. There are very few monitors outside of Apple's that have that port. In other words, the whole idea of adding a mini to your existing peripherals would be mute if it had a display port that was not backward compatible.
If Apple were to update the mini or redesign it, that would mean adding a display port. There are very few monitors outside of Apple's that have that port. In other words, the whole idea of adding a mini to your existing peripherals would be mute if it had a display port that was not backward compatible.
Over 110 pages later and a year since the Mini thread was first started and not a single one of you get it! Lets be real for a minute do you really think it takes this long for a design engineer to create a new Mini which is the simplest thing in the world to design! Its over.
The new entry level Mac is now the Mac Book, I personally feel that Apple has no interest of any sort in the headless computer arena and have moved on without addressing all the winning crying little children that say there life is over with out a Mini replacement.
Lets face it the Mini has been silently phased out like it or not. If you still want one buy the current one while supplies last or just move on with life!
Not really, as much as we have panned Apple lately for all the adapters you need, the mini display port isn't all that bad in this case as for the majority of the time you would not be moving the Mini so an adapter isn't something so easily lost in comparison to adapters for portables that are always travelling. A $30 adapter that allows you to keep your very nice existing monitor, whether it be an older ACD or a more PC orientated brand is a suitable compromise.
That's a good point. But it does add additional cost and complexity to the equation. It may seem silly to suggest adding an adapter is complicated, but for PC users considering the switch, many of them have no idea what connector their monitor uses thus which adapter to buy.
Consider an Apple Store scenario: a customer walks in and thinks they might like to try a mac and the mini is suggested because they don't need to replace their monitor, keyboard, and mouse. "Well, you will probably need a display adapter if you have an older monitor", the Apple sales person says. "What adapter do I need", the confused customer asks? VGA? DVI? None? A lot of people wouldn't know and neither would the Apple staff. Customer would leave to find out and never come back. Too much trouble. Sad but true.
You are a comedian. If you think I am going to spend $1000 to buy the "entry level" Apple product you are dreaming. The Mini works as it is much cheaper than the other Apple products (value for money is debatable now) and you could connect your existing PC hardware without worry. It was an entry level product so you could comfortable with the "new world". At $1000 you are making a pretty significant investment for something you may not necessarily be 100% confident in (as a switcher from windows).
Not really, as much as we have panned Apple lately for all the adapters you need, the mini display port isn't all that bad in this case as for the majority of the time you would not be moving the Mini so an adapter isn't something so easily lost in comparison to adapters for portables that are always travelling. A $30 adapter that allows you to keep your very nice existing monitor, whether it be an older ACD or a more PC orientated brand is a suitable compromise.
Sometimes I think Apple is not interested in the Mac Minis, the Minis aren't receiving enough promotion and they're the last to receive update or then they aren`t upgraded. I can`t understand this behavior, the Mini is the
computer of the masses and if to receive the adequate updatings would be the appropriate secret weapon to enter every household around the world.
Lately, I think Apple is acting in an arbitrary manner. First they are elimanating fireWire and now they want end with the Mac Mini. What will be the
next? And what about users?
foolish.
Just bung the macbook motherboard into an atv/mini case and sell it for a sensible price please.
foolish.
Just bung the macbook motherboard into an atv/mini case and sell it for a sensible price please.