Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

1.33 and 1.42 GHz iBook (last rev) owners! Look here!

BlizzardBomb said:
Are you speaking from experience? My 9600 in my iMac G5 was clocked at the regular speeds (wasn't underclocked by Apple). :)
Click to expand...

Yes I know that (I also have rad 9600 in my iMac)

The clock speeds, according to ATIccelerator II are 324 MHz core and 202.5 memory, which is lower than regular mobility 9600 (350+ MHz core, cant find memory clocks)

Apple ALWAYS underclocks cards that come with their computers. Why do you think 9600 is so overclockable? Only becasue its been underclocked before
 
eXan said:
Yes I know that (I also have rad 9600 in my iMac)

The clock speeds, according to ATIccelerator II are 324 MHz core and 202.5 memory, which is lower than regular mobility 9600 (350+ MHz core, cant find memory clocks)

Apple ALWAYS underclocks cards that come with their computers. Why do you think 9600 is so overclockable? Only becasue its been underclocked before
Click to expand...

Scroll down to the chart. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R300

Different cards handle overclocking differently :)
 
So i have the 9600XT in my PM

Where canI find out the most reasonable increase to my stock 9600xt?

Thanks,

F
 
eXan said:
Hmm... interesting article, makes me think that I might be wrong... ;)

Still, it says 9600's core is 325 MHz, while I have 324 :D lol

Anyway, I seem to have confused my judgments with 9600XT! :eek:
Click to expand...
Yeah, I checked my stock GPU and memory speeds on my 9600 before I did anything. I got 324 with stock being 325. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back