Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It will be interesting to see where that tech goes. If it goes in a good direction, then we might see that for hard drives in the future... Then again, if they can't get the price per GB to a reasonable level, it will remain a niche market.

Time will tell.
 
Solid State Harddrive Prices!

Get ready for this. The coworker who has the 17 Gig solid state drive (needs it so it can be put on a F18 - no moving parts so it can handle the G-Forces and still work) goes for, drum roll.....

$33,000.00, yep, that's right, $33k

OMG, its going to take a few years for this technology to hit the mainstream.

Sad thing is, its only faster and seek times, the overall data rate is dependant on the connect (UltraSCSI in this case)
 
OMFG!!! That's just plain silly... Who in hell can afford that as an end user??? Take a few zero's off the price and I would have considered it, but 33 grand??? Sheeeeeeeit!

Since you said it was UltraSCSI, which maxes out at 20MB/sec, that's a ton of green for sorry performance (drive to system). Hell, ATA33 beats that.
 
Originally posted by AlphaTech

Since you said it was UltraSCSI, which maxes out at 20MB/sec, that's a ton of green for sorry performance (drive to system). Hell, ATA33 beats that.

Oops, sorry, thats SCSI 2, so its 40MB/sec. But still that doesn't justify the price for only 17 Gigs. Like I said, places were moving parts are an issue, this is what you go for. You know and diskdrives that could take 10Gs and still read and write without the head being forced into the platter??

And since it was on contract, its not our own money, but still, you do have to wince a little....
 
The highest thing I've ever seen on a removable disk type medium is the blue laser DVD that can store 30 gigs. There's also that holographic thing that has almost limitless potential because it works in three dimentions instead of two like a cd style disk such as a DVD or CD-ROM. Who ever wants an explanation of the holographic storage medium, just write and it'll come to me.
 
Whoops, didn't see the posts about solid state storage until too late. anyways, here's my spiel (or whatever that word is...):

All of these new abilities to write more and more on optical and magnetic media are great, but I believe they will become like what tape drives are now. Even if you have a 100000 RPM hard drive, or a 1000x CD burner, it would be impractical to put something like that in a laptop, or something that runs off a battery or has to take up little space. Tape drives were seen as something good, because they could hold so much data, but they had really slow access speeds... There are limitations to mechanical devices, such as optical media, and hard drives. What I see taking off in the future, is memory on chips, like the kind of memory that is used to make the L1 cache (I think it's called SRAM.) It doesn't need to be refreshed with power to hold its data, and has fast access times. If they could shrink down the size of chips, or even use some new DNA or atom sized transistors, I imagine you could get over 100 gigs in a relatively small space. It may take a while, but in the long run, I think it would be more beneficial. I just don't see optical technology going to super high capacities for much useful purposes where fast access time is an important factor. It would be nice, though, to store video and stuff all on one disc.

Eventually, cd's and hard drives will give way to smaller, faster, more powerful storage devices with large capacities and no moving parts. If you could utilize 20 512mb high speed ram chips into one storage device, you would have a very fast storage device.It would be expensive and bulky, but eventually, I think that things will come down to size and price. It may take 10-20 years or so, but I think it will be better...

Until then... 100gb of data sounds good for storing a whole series of a TV show... or, holographic, 3d TV... I'm thinking too much... oh well...
 
Originally posted by G4scott
Whoops, didn't see the posts about solid state storage until too late. anyways, here's my spiel (or whatever that word is...):

All of these new abilities to write more and more on optical and magnetic media are great, but I believe they will become like what tape drives are now. Even if you have a 100000 RPM hard drive, or a 1000x CD burner, it would be impractical to put something like that in a laptop, or something that runs off a battery or has to take up little space. Tape drives were seen as something good, because they could hold so much data, but they had really slow access speeds... There are limitations to mechanical devices, such as optical media, and hard drives. What I see taking off in the future, is memory on chips, like the kind of memory that is used to make the L1 cache (I think it's called SRAM.) It doesn't need to be refreshed with power to hold its data, and has fast access times. If they could shrink down the size of chips, or even use some new DNA or atom sized transistors, I imagine you could get over 100 gigs in a relatively small space. It may take a while, but in the long run, I think it would be more beneficial. I just don't see optical technology going to super high capacities for much useful purposes where fast access time is an important factor. It would be nice, though, to store video and stuff all on one disc.

Eventually, cd's and hard drives will give way to smaller, faster, more powerful storage devices with large capacities and no moving parts. If you could utilize 20 512mb high speed ram chips into one storage device, you would have a very fast storage device.It would be expensive and bulky, but eventually, I think that things will come down to size and price. It may take 10-20 years or so, but I think it will be better...

Until then... 100gb of data sounds good for storing a whole series of a TV show... or, holographic, 3d TV... I'm thinking too much... oh well...



Hey, look @ IBM's MICRODRIVE and the Compact Flash Cards. They're @ 1 GB each and they are pretty small and their capacity is just gunna get bigger.
 
umm.. jus a question...

why are discs that jus hold data still called "Digital Video Discs"... i know they originally stood for "Digital Versatile Disc".. but i havent seen that around for a while.. so why dont they go back to the old name for discs that just hold data? :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.