What, you're not grateful to me for disabusing you from a flawed notion? I'm shocked.
So what we know is that the method for estimating how many species are going extinct daily is seriously flawed. So the numbers aren't reliable.
Which was my original point.
"We" don't know enough to claim that anything is "seriously flawed." That's a value judgment on the downstream effect of the error in other analyses.
You're a pleasure to speak to, but I don't think you want to do anything other than be cranky. Thanks for your contribution!