Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1066Mhz on a 3.46Ghz 12 Core?
- Thread starter sammyman
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Does it have to all be matching? I believe all my RAM is 1333, but 2 of the sticks aren't matching.
Doing another PRAM reset now and pulling everything out to verify.
These 3 sticks are 1066 only and 24GB.
Better is when you put ram to slots: 1, 2, 3, 4-must be free. Then you have tripple-channel memory.
When you put RAM to all 4 slots, you have only double channel memory.
It does not matter the speed of memory, 1066 is only 2-3% slower then 1333.
It's better to run 48GB (3 slots) at 1333.
Thank you! I don't understand the difference between double channel and triple channel, but I'm going to listen to your advice and keep 1-3 and 5-7 installed, leaving 4 and 8 open.
Same situation here. When running 3 sticks, I got 1333, but only 1066 when use all slots. (All 4 sticks are the same)
Anyway, after some tests. It's no way to tell the difference in speed for normal real world usage.
For benchmarking, yes, triple channel will shows better result. However, for real world usage, more RAM usually will win (because more cache avail for the system).
So, if 48G is good enough for you, of course you can run them in triple channel configuration. However, if you able to use all of them, that means go for 64G is the better choice. Otherwise, if the system start to use HDD because running out of RAM, that will be 1000 times worst than running the RAM in 1066.
Anyway, after some tests. It's no way to tell the difference in speed for normal real world usage.
For benchmarking, yes, triple channel will shows better result. However, for real world usage, more RAM usually will win (because more cache avail for the system).
So, if 48G is good enough for you, of course you can run them in triple channel configuration. However, if you able to use all of them, that means go for 64G is the better choice. Otherwise, if the system start to use HDD because running out of RAM, that will be 1000 times worst than running the RAM in 1066.
If you use 4 sticks of 1333MHz 1,35V (low power) RAM it will run at 1066MHz and 2-way interleave (3 sticks should run at 1333MHz), if you use quad-rank RAM it will run at 1066MHz and 4 sticks will run at 800MHz and 2-way interleave whatever the frequency supported by the RAM. 4 identical sticks of single or dual-rank memory at 1333MHz/1,5V should run at 1333MHz (and again 2-way interleave). More information here.
Last edited:
Nope. It does not work like this.
When all slots are populated with identical sticks you still have triple channel, only bandwidth between slots 3 and 4 is shared. Dual channel is when stick are in 2 slots. It was said many times before BTW
And IMHO it's better to have a sufficient amount 1066 RAM than insufficient 1333
Nope. It does not work like this.
When all slots are populated with identical sticks you still have triple channel, only bandwidth between slots 3 and 4 is shared. Dual channel is when stick are in 2 slots. It was said many times before BTW
And IMHO it's better to have a sufficient amount 1066 RAM than insufficient 1333
Ok this is interesting because I tested this theory in my 4,1->5,1 machine. It sees my DIMMs as 1333MHz no matter how many I have in, but with three DIMMs it actually scores higher then with four even though I have more memory with the latter.
These are OWC DIMMs too, and supposed to be for the 5,1 MP.
This is how it works with the Mac Pro and 4 DIMMs.
It's slightly faster than dual-channel bandwidth, but of course you likely have more capacity so it's basically irrelevant in the real world, as is 1333MHz vs 1066MHz. On a dual CPU system remember you are often going to be access memory from one CPU with the other also so QPI interconnect is also a factor - but again irrelevant for creative workstation usage.
With 1.5v 1333MHz DIMMs you should get that speed no matter how many DIMMs you use.
It's slightly faster than dual-channel bandwidth, but of course you likely have more capacity so it's basically irrelevant in the real world, as is 1333MHz vs 1066MHz. On a dual CPU system remember you are often going to be access memory from one CPU with the other also so QPI interconnect is also a factor - but again irrelevant for creative workstation usage.
With 1.5v 1333MHz DIMMs you should get that speed no matter how many DIMMs you use.