Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gregt

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 22, 2009
1
0
I am using a MacBook Pro running 10.6.4 with 2.66 Duo processor, 4GB RAM
I am planning on using final cut express to edit video. I am considering a camcorder that runs1080p (panasonic tm700k). Is 1080p going to be too much to handle for my dual processor machine?
 
hey, your machine should be able to handle it fine, i edited ALOT of 720p video on a 2.13 ghz c2d with 2 gb of 667 mh ddr2 ram in a first gen macbook. So being you are running a bigger system you should be good, it will take a while for the video to render and export and all that but your dealling with some pretty big files.

1080i = 540p

the i means that it is only showing you half of the lines so 720 is a higher resolution then 1080i.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

TopHatPlus said:
hey, your machine should be able to handle it fine, i edited ALOT of 720p video on a 2.13 ghz c2d with 2 gb of 667 mh ddr2 ram in a first gen macbook. So being you are running a bigger system you should be good, it will take a while for the video to render and export and all that but your dealling with some pretty big files.

1080i = 540p

the i means that it is only showing you half of the lines so 720 is a higher resolution then 1080i.

No, 1080i still has twice the width as compared to 540p.
 
hey, your machine should be able to handle it fine, i edited ALOT of 720p video on a 2.13 ghz c2d with 2 gb of 667 mh ddr2 ram in a first gen macbook. So being you are running a bigger system you should be good, it will take a while for the video to render and export and all that but your dealling with some pretty big files.

1080i = 540p

the i means that it is only showing you half of the lines so 720 is a higher resolution then 1080i.

"i" is short for interlaced, thus one has 1080 vertical lines, just that they alternate, and it is surely not 540p.
 
That's commonly mistaken by so many people though.

The best way I explain 1080p vs i is both have 1080 lines of resolution, progressive refreshes every line while displaying video and interlaced refreshes every second line.

Interlaced vs Progressive

What is commonly mistaken?
The fact, that 1080i is using alternate fields and provides the same resolution as 1080p and is NOT 540p?

I know, that 1080i is not the same quality as 1080p, especially with fast moving objects, which your link relied on, but it is more than 540p or 576i.
http://www.digitalphotographywriter.com/2010/08/hd-1080p-vs-1080i-videos-progressive.html
 
Yeah 1080i60 has similar overall resolution to 1080p30.
This camera the OP has however is 1080p60, I doubt you will be able to edit it at true 60 progressive frames a second at 1080 without a professional program like final cut pro or avid. I'm a FCP user so I'm not 100% on this but FCE will likely put it into a 1080i60 or 1080p30 timeline, you'll lose the progressive resolution if it's 1080i60 or you'll lose the smooth motion/framerate if it's 1080p30.
 
What is commonly mistaken?
The fact, that 1080i is using alternate fields and provides the same resolution as 1080p and is NOT 540p?

I know, that 1080i is not the same quality as 1080p, especially with fast moving objects, which your link relied on, but it is more than 540p or 576i.
http://www.digitalphotographywriter.com/2010/08/hd-1080p-vs-1080i-videos-progressive.html

It's commonly mistaken by people like jlw2387, not you, that 1080i is 540p. I was agreeing with your post.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.