Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here are my i5 scores. Expect the i7 to be about 5-10% faster for the CPU scores and similar for disk and GPU scores.

Geekbench Single Core: 1244
Geekbench Multi Core: 4484
Geekbench Compure (OpenCL): 8257
Geekbench Compute (Metal): 9563
Cinebench R20: 1836
Cinebench R20 Single Core: 417
Cinebench MP Ratio: 4.4
BlackMagic Disk Speed Write: Updated 2265MB/S
BlackMagic Disk Speed Read: 2050MB/S
 
In case you're wondering, my score for i9 9880H (the 2.3GHz model) is:

Cinebench R20: 3415
Cinebench R20 Single Core: 445

The 10th gen Intel chip has been a letdown on the Windows side as well. They're not that much faster than 8th or 9th gen.
 
for mbp 13 or 16?


Here are my i5 scores. Expect the i7 to be about 5-10% faster for the CPU scores and similar for disk and GPU scores.

Geekbench Single Core: 1244
Geekbench Multi Core: 4484
Geekbench Compure (OpenCL): 8257
Geekbench Compute (Metal): 9563
Cinebench R20: 1836
Cinebench R20 Single Core: 417
Cinebench MP Ratio: 4.4
BlackMagic Disk Speed Write: Updated 2265MB/S
BlackMagic Disk Speed Read: 2050MB/S
Here are my i5 scores. Expect the i7 to be about 5-10% faster for the CPU scores and similar for disk and GPU scores.

Geekbench Single Core: 1244
Geekbench Multi Core: 4484
Geekbench Compure (OpenCL): 8257
Geekbench Compute (Metal): 9563
Cinebench R20: 1836
Cinebench R20 Single Core: 417
Cinebench MP Ratio: 4.4
BlackMagic Disk Speed Write: Updated 2265MB/S
BlackMagic Disk Speed Read: 2050MB/S
[automerge]1588908717[/automerge]
for mbp 13 or 16?
[automerge]1588908760[/automerge]
In case you're wondering, my score for i9 9880H (the 2.3GHz model) is:

Cinebench R20: 3415
Cinebench R20 Single Core: 445

The 10th gen Intel chip has been a letdown on the Windows side as well. They're not that much faster than 8th or 9th gen.
I thought the i9 8 core gets like 6300?
 
In case you're wondering, my score for i9 9880H (the 2.3GHz model) is:

Cinebench R20: 3415
Cinebench R20 Single Core: 445

The 10th gen Intel chip has been a letdown on the Windows side as well. They're not that much faster than 8th or 9th gen.
Ice Lake processors have faster GPUs but only moderate CPU improvements. Comet Lake processors have bigger CPU gains but only UHD graphics.
 
9th gen chips > 10th gen > 8th gen intel processors at this moment.

Later this year intel will release new intel 10th chips that will be much faster than the 9th gen. For now 9th gen is great for gaming, video editing, photoshop etc
 
9th gen chips > 10th gen > 8th gen intel processors at this moment.

Later this year intel will release new intel 10th chips that will be much faster than the 9th gen. For now 9th gen is great for gaming, video editing, photoshop etc
the chips for the 16" won't be 10nm so theyll be very marginally faster at best
 
the chips for the 16" won't be 10nm so theyll be very marginally faster at best
marginally better than the 16 inch chips now? what will be the benefits
[automerge]1589016657[/automerge]
Ice Lake processors have faster GPUs but only moderate CPU improvements. Comet Lake processors have bigger CPU gains but only UHD graphics.
is that good or bad... im coming for a 2016 quad core i7
[automerge]1589016845[/automerge]
There's no i5 in 16".

Also are you sure you are not thinking of Geekbench? In terms of Geekbench, my i9 gets:
Single Core 1105
Multi Core 6580

ya I was looking at geek bench, my 15 inch from 2016 was half the speed
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.