Uses more power, generates more heat, etc.About to have a 2010 Mac processor upgrade. Other than additional cost, is there anything negative about getting a 12 core over a 6 core?
Upgrading a 2010 2.4 8 core...You plan to upgrade from 6 to 12?
Not using anything right now that would utilize 12 core. (On PS6 with plans on upgrading to CC soon and going to be getting into video at some point.) Was originally just going to upgrade to a 6 core, but wondered if it would be smarter to go ahead and move to a 12 core for future use. I had read some time back that having the dual processors could actually slow down some programs that were optimized for multi-processor so didn't want to do something that might actually slow down programs - so I guess that is one of my main concerns.I've upgraded my 2010 Mac Pro to the fastest processors you can get for it, dual six-core 3.46 Ghz Xeons, a while back. Definitely a speed improvement for sure.
It does use more energy and has a higher TDP, so something to keep in mind. But the Mac Pro chassis can handle it easily.
If you plan on doing constant video rendering or anything that will utilize and stress the CPUs frequently, then I'd jut make sure the Mac has good airflow around it and is not butted up against a wall.
I'd also only go this route if you utilize programs like Adobe CC that can use the 12-cores frequently and in tandem.
Upgrading a 2010 2.4 8 core...
Yeah it makes my room hot.Uses more power, generates more heat, etc.
Dual 130W processors are out of spec for the Mac Pro (but it should be fine).
Some tasks might be faster using fewer cores at higher frequency than distributed across greater cores.
Yeah it makes my room hot.
Hahah. during summer I get all sweaty. Oh man. I can see the benefit of low powered machine.It's my best foot warmer in winter