Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's my fault for not explaining my stance more clearly. I never said science accepts everything as true until proven false. Scientific theories are held to be true because no data has be found yet that contradicts those theories.

Yes, but you are glossing over the amount of evidence required to turn a mere hypothesis into an accepted Theory. Typically, no hypothesis gets elevated unless it can be used to predict something that no one has ever noticed before, and experiments can be devised to detect the predicted phenomenum. And any widely accepted Theory has been confirmed by multiple independent predictive experiments.
 
I watched the video and while there's no doubt he is smart (probably) the quantum mechanics section was really just basic definitions of quantum numbers and the wavefunction.

The part about relativity is just nonsensical, there's nothing in his equations that suggests density is related to the speed of light (although the speed of sound is inversely related to the density of the medium - it seems like he would be in favour of an aether theorem), the speed of light is very well defined and tested and there is absolutely no evidence for tachyons (I don't know of any theoretical background to support tachyons either).

I hope he keeps it up.

EDIT:
That is completely inaccurate, there are plenty of ways the theory can be disproven - if that were not so then it would not be a scientific theory. Protip, everything in science can be disproven.

lol i didn't mean it literally it was more like an "omg schoolgirl moment"
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.