That's really funny! Just because Apple changes its computer lineup to accommodate changes in consumer demands is certainly not an indication that they don't care about their computer division. They still sell about a million Macs a month, and they wouldn't have bothered to release Lion if they didn't have plans to continue developing the computer line. Lion clearly shows some convergence of function between iOS and Mac OS, indicating a more seamless compatibility between computers and other devices in the future. Some people freak out if Apple doesn't update every device exactly when they're expected to. They update and release new products when they believe the timing is right, not when some elements of the public thinks so.Besides, it's well known that Apple doesn't really care about its computer line anymore. They keep releasing them because they know they have no choice; the market wants them. But XServe died, the poly MacBook died, and the Mac Pro might as well be on life support.
Worst comment I've ever heard.Besides, it's well known that Apple doesn't really care about its computer line anymore. They keep releasing them because they know they have no choice; the market wants them. But XServe died, the poly MacBook died, and the Mac Pro might as well be on life support. Now there's stories of Apple possibly poisoning the MacBook Pro line. Might as well refer to them as Apple Taylor Moore at this point.
Worst comment I've ever heard.
Xserve died because it's aimed at corporations and businesses, most of which already have servers from other companies. What kind of a prosumer would buy a 1U-mounted server?
Polycarbonate MacBook died because a much thinner and improved MacBook Air is way more efficient and cost effective. Derp.
MacBook Pros are refreshed every 14 months and are the BEST SELLING LAPTOP in the US.
iMacs are refreshed every 14 months and are the BEST SELLING DESKTOPS in the US.
I do not know of a computer that can rival the Mac Pro's sheer number of cores (up to 12!).
Mac Mini is wildly popular with switchers and the HTPC community.
Apple would be insane to abandon this and go mobile only.
The vast majority of computer buyers are not asking for touchscreen anything. Touchscreen on any laptop or desktop display would be horrible ergonomics, as you'd have to keep your arm raised, rather than resting your wrists on a wristpad or desktop.And yet, you've got people asking for:
- An iPad screen on a notebook
- LaunchPad to be the only interface for the notebooks
- A touchscreen Thunderbolt Display
- A touchscreen iMac
There may have been isolated cases of defective models, as there are with ANY model of any device ever made by any manufacturer, but the vast majority of MBPs did not have such issues.Apple refreshed the MacBook Pro with the 2011 version. And what happened? Sloppy thermal paste, overheating, uneven keyboards, poor screens....
Again, you take a viewpoint held by a small minority and try to assign it to the masses. If Lion was so poorly received, explain the record sales.Apple released Lion. And what happened? Numerous reviews blasting how it feels like a step backwards - a step towards some iOS computing bastardization. Changes in color scheme, changes in interface to appeal to an iOS crowd.
Again, the minority speaks. Despite your inaccurate "gloom and doom" picture, they sold like hotcakes.Apple released the MacBook Air with a piss poor screen color gamut, poor travel, and no upgradeability. While it's a solid machine, people constantly comment on how the screen is inferior to even the iPad's screen for some reason.
You can go on and on, trying to claim that Apple's computer line is in decline, but the facts disprove everything you're saying. Yes, there will always be a minority that dislike anything made by Apple. You can't please all the people all the time. But Apple sales figures prove that your theory is baseless.
That's because sheep buy anything that has an Apple on it. Doesn't make it any good. VIZIO televisions sell like crack on a Brooklyn corner too, doesn't make them any good.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1213787/
There are people, and I would submit they are the majority now thanks to iPad, who now want to touch every damn thing.
Like millions of Apple customers, I'm no sheep. I've been using computers over 40 years and I've been buying personal computers since they were first available. I have no brand loyalty at all. I buy only what meets my needs. I buy Macs, not because they have an Apple logo on them, but because Mac OS X meets my needs better than Windows. My primary Mac is a 3 1/2 year old MBP running Leopard which has performed reliably and trouble-free since the day I bought it. I could never say that about any of the dozens of notebooks or desktops I've bought in the past. I don't need, have or want an iPad, iPod or iPhone. I don't need or want touchscreen. Siri would be helpful if it means I can dictate posts like this, among other things, saving the aggravation of my CTS.That's because sheep buy anything that has an Apple on it.
Just because there are a few who like to complain about everything, doesn't make Apple products bad, either. If they were bad, people would stop buying them. There's plenty of competition out there. That's the nature of a free market: if you want to succeed, give the consumers what they need/want. If you fail to meet their needs, someone else will. Apple's success is proof of the fact that they meet consumers' needs, not that they've managed to find over a million "sheep" per month to buy their Macs.Doesn't make it any good.