Hi All,
The time has come for me to go mobile, and obviously I'm going Macbook Pro (being a Mac convert for nearly 2 years!).
If you don't feel like a story, skip to the last paragraph
My local apple store is running a special on old stock of 2008 MBP.
They have a 15" model going for R16,000 (+- $2000). The specs are; 2.5Ghz, 2Gb Ram, 250GB HDD, 9600GT GFX). To put it in perspective; a 2009 version of this MBP will cost me R21,500 ($2700)
My initial thought before I saw this special was to go for the base 13" MBP, R14,000 ($1750), which has these specs; 2.26Ghz, 2Gb Ram, 160Gb HDD, and 9400m GFX.
Now according to my searching, the main differences between the 2008/9 models is the maximum ammount of RAM, and SD card slot. Both of which I can live with.
I read some reviews that spoke of the new LCD's in the 2009 models being significantly better, but I'm unsure if they were compairing them (the new 2009 models) to Macbooks, 'pre-aluminum" MBPs, or 2008 MBPs.
Now I'm a video editor, and the whole point of buying a MBP is so I can edit on the road. I know both of these models will handle HDV footage more than happily when bumped up to 4Gbs of RAM. However, I'm obviously concerned about LCD quality, if by buying the 13" Model I will get a significantly better screen.
Once again, I do some After Effects works from time-to-time, so the better graphics card pushes me towards the 15" 2008 Model.
So basically; will I be shooting myself in the foot by buying a year old MBP just to get a bigger screen and faster GFX? Or am I completely overthinking this, and by the time I need to upgrade, it'll be 5 years later and laptops will be running 8 cores?
Many thanks,
R
The time has come for me to go mobile, and obviously I'm going Macbook Pro (being a Mac convert for nearly 2 years!).
If you don't feel like a story, skip to the last paragraph
My local apple store is running a special on old stock of 2008 MBP.
They have a 15" model going for R16,000 (+- $2000). The specs are; 2.5Ghz, 2Gb Ram, 250GB HDD, 9600GT GFX). To put it in perspective; a 2009 version of this MBP will cost me R21,500 ($2700)
My initial thought before I saw this special was to go for the base 13" MBP, R14,000 ($1750), which has these specs; 2.26Ghz, 2Gb Ram, 160Gb HDD, and 9400m GFX.
Now according to my searching, the main differences between the 2008/9 models is the maximum ammount of RAM, and SD card slot. Both of which I can live with.
I read some reviews that spoke of the new LCD's in the 2009 models being significantly better, but I'm unsure if they were compairing them (the new 2009 models) to Macbooks, 'pre-aluminum" MBPs, or 2008 MBPs.
Now I'm a video editor, and the whole point of buying a MBP is so I can edit on the road. I know both of these models will handle HDV footage more than happily when bumped up to 4Gbs of RAM. However, I'm obviously concerned about LCD quality, if by buying the 13" Model I will get a significantly better screen.
Once again, I do some After Effects works from time-to-time, so the better graphics card pushes me towards the 15" 2008 Model.
So basically; will I be shooting myself in the foot by buying a year old MBP just to get a bigger screen and faster GFX? Or am I completely overthinking this, and by the time I need to upgrade, it'll be 5 years later and laptops will be running 8 cores?
Many thanks,
R