13" MBP Benchmarks

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by firsttimemac, Apr 14, 2010.

  1. firsttimemac macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    #1
    Could someone please post some benchmark comparison between the new and old 13" MBP.

    Please ignore this comment!!
     
  2. firsttimemac thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    #2
  3. rob2809 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    #3
  4. greg400 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    #4
    Both machines have the EXACT same processor. The only reason there is a score bump in the 2008 model is because that user was running GeekBench in 64-bit mode.

    The real performance gains will be in the GPU and battery life for the 2010 13".
     
  5. DLovett macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    #5
    I believe that was from the guy that just got his 13" a couple of threads down.

    The scores would probably be the same if GeekBench had been run in 64-bit for the 13".
     
  6. firsttimemac thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    #6
  7. greg400 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    #7
    Any other benchmark differences will matter on how many processes the user has running. There will be no increase or decrease in performance on the two machines otherwise on the processor scores.
     
  8. kaiserben macrumors member

    kaiserben

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Location:
    South of France
    #8
    What would be interresting is benchmark on the GPU capabilities !
     
  9. firsttimemac thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    #9
    Oh i would want to see that. I thought that the geekbench scores took into consideration the GPU capabilities as well.

    But guys, Im new to apple, but i cant stop wondering " How do you guys not get frustrated with Apple". How can you put up with this using of CPUs used in a 2008 model again in the 2010 model. Its just preposterous.
     
  10. greg400 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    #10
    They had no choice. It was either a C2D with a better GPU or an i3 with a worse GPU.
     
  11. firsttimemac thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    #11
    But there are better C2D's available. And who stopped them from making some changes t the board and adding a discrete GPU.
    All said and done, if nothing was possible they could have at least lowered the prices a bit. We all know charging 1499 for the high end is not at all justified.
     

Share This Page