Hello all,
Would really appreciate some advice on this.
Managed to pick up this Dell monitor, at a very nice discount.
I slipped up in not focusing on the inputs - mistakenly assuming DisplayPort was the same as HDMI [don't ask!]...
I have my office (Dell) monitor setup with the DVI-D cable, through a Mini-Display Port <> DVI adaptor, and it works.
My question - should I rather try and get my new monitor working through the DisplayPort cable, or is DVI-D still ok-ish?
DisplayPort is not that common around these parts. HDMI obviously is - and I'm still finding plenty of DVI-D connectors.
What should I do?
1.) Another MDport<>DVI adapter + 0.5m (1.6ft) DVI cable;
2.) 3m (9.8ft) MDport male to DVI male cable - which will presumably simply slot in from my MBP's mini-display port, straight into the back of the monitor, with no adapter being required; [I can only source a 3m cable -- nothing shorter!
]
3.) MDport<>HDMI adapter + HDMI<>HDMI cable + HDMI<>DVI converter...
The latter appears to be the only way I will be able to utilise the HDMI cable. I cannot find either a HDMI<>DVI or HDMI<>DisplayPort cable, at least not locally.
So obviously, whereas I will be able to use HDMI, I'd need to jump through two adapter/converters...
The 2nd option is most appealing -- less adapters BUT, as mentioned, I'll be stuck with a cumbersome(?) 3m cable... Sure I can roll it up I guess...
Any advice on the difference, if any, between DVI-D direct, DVI-D via a converter, or HDMI through multiple converters -- will be appreciated.
Oh - and won't be using this for any gaming. Occasional movie, but mostly writing based work/research, want the real estate for side-by-side stuff...
Would really appreciate some advice on this.
Managed to pick up this Dell monitor, at a very nice discount.
I slipped up in not focusing on the inputs - mistakenly assuming DisplayPort was the same as HDMI [don't ask!]...
I have my office (Dell) monitor setup with the DVI-D cable, through a Mini-Display Port <> DVI adaptor, and it works.
My question - should I rather try and get my new monitor working through the DisplayPort cable, or is DVI-D still ok-ish?
DisplayPort is not that common around these parts. HDMI obviously is - and I'm still finding plenty of DVI-D connectors.
What should I do?
1.) Another MDport<>DVI adapter + 0.5m (1.6ft) DVI cable;
2.) 3m (9.8ft) MDport male to DVI male cable - which will presumably simply slot in from my MBP's mini-display port, straight into the back of the monitor, with no adapter being required; [I can only source a 3m cable -- nothing shorter!
3.) MDport<>HDMI adapter + HDMI<>HDMI cable + HDMI<>DVI converter...
The latter appears to be the only way I will be able to utilise the HDMI cable. I cannot find either a HDMI<>DVI or HDMI<>DisplayPort cable, at least not locally.
So obviously, whereas I will be able to use HDMI, I'd need to jump through two adapter/converters...
The 2nd option is most appealing -- less adapters BUT, as mentioned, I'll be stuck with a cumbersome(?) 3m cable... Sure I can roll it up I guess...
Any advice on the difference, if any, between DVI-D direct, DVI-D via a converter, or HDMI through multiple converters -- will be appreciated.
Oh - and won't be using this for any gaming. Occasional movie, but mostly writing based work/research, want the real estate for side-by-side stuff...