Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

RqThrottle

macrumors member
Original poster
Aug 5, 2004
79
7
Boston
My 13" made it home a full day ahead of schedule.

Took it out of the box, took off the HD, and popped in the X-25 (latest firmware applied).

Xbench score 189.

Just to put that score in perspective...

My Santa Rosa 17" 2.4Ghz C2D manages 115 with a new seagate momentum 7200 and 4Gb RAM... (scored 99 with Apple's original 7200 HD)

It is fast enough for me...

P.S. It estimates 12:53 hours of battery usage as I am writing this... terrible, terrible upgrade...
 

novodigo

macrumors newbie
Apr 10, 2010
17
0
My 13" made it home a full day ahead of schedule.

Took it out of the box, took off the HD, and popped in the X-25 (latest firmware applied).

Xbench score 189.

Just to put that score in perspective...

My Santa Rosa 17" 2.4Ghz C2D manages 115 with a new seagate momentum 7200 and 4Gb RAM... (scored 99 with Apple's original 7200 HD)

It is fast enough for me...

P.S. It estimates 12:53 hours of battery usage as I am writing this... terrible, terrible upgrade...

Just try to put the same SSD in the i5...
 

MacModMachine

macrumors 68020
Apr 3, 2009
2,476
392
Canada
i just got my 13" today 2.66ghz

i noticed alot of different things, like booting from SD cards shows a SD card picture, its also much faster using SD even though its still through usb bus.

the sata controller is showing up as unkown for some reason.

battery life is about the same as my 2.53 2009 model 13".

im running 2 ssd's , 1 160gb intel x25m g2 and a 256gb kingston.

160gb intel - scores 207.69
kingston 256gb - scores 208.58

the machine runs great, alot cooler i have noticed.

going to pop in 8gb ram kit tommorow and see how that goes.
 

Jon03021

macrumors member
Apr 14, 2010
39
0
Does anyone have xbench scores of the Apple SSD? This way we could compare these numbers with the Intel x-25
 

carbonfly

macrumors regular
Nov 9, 2007
188
0
How do I determine what firmware my x25-m has? I was looking under system profiler but didn't see anything.

BTW, My 13" 2.4 scored 182 on xbench
 

jolsrud

macrumors newbie
Apr 20, 2010
29
0
My 13" made it home a full day ahead of schedule.

Took it out of the box, took off the HD, and popped in the X-25 (latest firmware applied).

Xbench score 189.

Just to put that score in perspective...

My Santa Rosa 17" 2.4Ghz C2D manages 115 with a new seagate momentum 7200 and 4Gb RAM... (scored 99 with Apple's original 7200 HD)

It is fast enough for me...

P.S. It estimates 12:53 hours of battery usage as I am writing this... terrible, terrible upgrade...


Will the SSD make any improvements on the batterytime?
 

typerlover

macrumors regular
Dec 31, 2006
115
1
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I just ran Xbench on my x-25 80gb that I just got yesterday and I'm using the 13" 2.0 Unibody Macbook from I believe it was 2008, and I scored 257.56.

I am thinking of upgrading to the new 13" MBP and assumed the SATA controller and mobo handling of the SSD would be faster on the new model, just wondering if this is just normal variation or if its slower?
 

bobm

macrumors member
Aug 10, 2006
60
9
Apple 512G SSD

Does anyone have xbench scores of the Apple SSD? This way we could compare these numbers with the Intel x-25

Just got my 13" 2.66 8G 512G SSD

Xbench below:

Results: 191.90
Disk Test: 215.21

The SSD is very fast from a hands on point of view. Battery seems much better.

This is coming from a 2008 13" 2.4G 4G ram w/ 500G 7200rpm Hitachi drive.

I'll compare them in depth later but I've very happy with the system so far.

I run Parallels and the XP startup time is amazing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.