Whether an iPad is fit for duty heavily depends on usecase, and I wouldn’t recommend it without knowing more about your use-case anyway
. There’s a reason I have MBP, iPad and iMac. Each have their use.
When do you suspect to use the laptop compared to your desktop computer then?
Yes indeed - What are your use-cases specifically. Whether the color space and better calibration of the display matter or the touchID sensor and T2 chip will matter more and so forth is a lot about use-case.
I think unless the color space matters and you’d need extra ports, I’d recommend the Air.
But really the TB model of the MBP is a good step of if the budget could allow for it without too much extra work and saving up. It comes with extra cooling, a higher TDP chip to go with it, and generally a lot better performance. - But again, use-case; if you don’t need that anyway, the Air will do you just fine I’m sure. The idea of getting faster hardware for future-proofing alone has never been super good, as you’d get more bang for your buck putting the budget that went to “more than you need” hardware, and putting it in the budget for an new computer some years down the line. The price-performance curve and the yearly advances in tech make it a less than ideal approach to overkill on hardware. Plus, it’s more than just performance. The fastest and the slowest 5.1 Mac Pro both get obsoleted at the same time and stop getting updates. Because it’s not about how fast the chips run, but what feature-sets they support.