No chance.
If Apple do this - maybe it'll be better if Steve Jobs retired. These decisions are stupidity.
Why? Just because you don't want one?
When you are the CEO of a computer company maybe someone will listen to you!
No chance.
If Apple do this - maybe it'll be better if Steve Jobs retired. These decisions are stupidity.
I don't see any point in a 15" air type lappy. Kinda pointless IMHO.
Ives clearly states the MacBook Air was the first computer to use the unibody construction the the Notebook event last October.
Apple just haven't used the term in their marketing before then, hence people don't associate it with the Air.
Then it is not for you! Do you see the point of everything that is on sale in the world?
To which we say:
WHY?! What's the point?!
The MacBook Air abysmally failed at being a really small, really thin computer, so now they're making it a really big, really thin computer?
I don't get it.
But they don't have to take the optical drive out in order to reach 8 hours if it has a sealed battery. The 17" still has its Optical Drive....
I call this rumor as BS.
Apple is probably releasing the mini-tablet instead. 7"~9" display, extended iPhone OS.why not make a netbook of similar style? 9 or 10" screen
Apple is probably releasing the mini-tablet instead. 7"~9" display, extended iPhone OS.
The Air is as dead as the Cube.
The Cube resurrected into the Mini, and the Air should resurrect into a Netbook.
Failed where? The MBA is the best machine in its niche, and sells well for the market it's targeted for.
But I have to agree that this rumor is NONSENSE. The MBA is SUPPOSED to have a smaller screen, but not to the point of a puny netbook (the latest trendy crap); 15" models are more than well covered by the MB and the MBP. This rumor has no bearing in reality and is just a page filler.
Why? Just because you don't want one?
When you are the CEO of a computer company maybe someone will listen to you!
Apple is probably releasing the mini-tablet instead. 7"~9" display, extended iPhone OS.
Why would anyone want a 15" MacBook Air?
Why would anyone need more than 640k of RAM?
Why would anyone want an LCD screen?
Why would anyone want a computer with no floppy drive?
Why would anyone need a GUI?
etc. etc. etc.
I would not call the Air a failure ... it seems to me that people who have never used it call it a failure. Having owned an Air now, I certainly love how light it is, how thin it is, and that I still get a nice bright 13" screen to work on if I'm on the road.
A 15" Air is a bad idea. A very very bad idea.
AppleInsider had a MacBook Air carbon fiber rumor not long ago. Maybe it's for the 15" MacBook Air too?- I really don't think that Apple will make a MBA that weighs much more than the existing 3 lb unit. If they come up with some way to make a 15" widescreen MBA weigh insignificantly more than the existing unit (I dunno, magnesium case parts, polymer screen instead of glass, new lighter battery from 17" MBP, etc. Who knows...), then they'll greenlight the product.
I would say that a properly done 7"~9" iPhone OS mini-tablet would have better usability than a Mac OS X netbook.- Steve has commented publicly that they're not interested in making a machine that has the reduced usability of a netbook (small screen, crappy keyboard, etc) & they're certainly not interested in competing in the netbook market based on price.
It might cost even more because Apple would want to make it as thin as possible, giving it worse components for higher prices.If Apple released a NetMac or something even vaguely trying to target the netbook market, it would certainly cost at least $700 or so, and netbook buyers would snub them because of the price, regardless of how good the machine was.
I have a G4 and Keynote runs slow at times. If that's how an Atom Mac will be like, then I completely agree with you.- There's been a rumor recently that they'd be using NVidia's ION platform for the mac mini. I could see them using it in the AppleTV as it fits that product perfectly, but speaking as someone owning a netbook with Leopard on it I don't think that Atom (even dual-core) will run their apps the way they want it to.
I would say that a properly done 7"~9" iPhone OS mini-tablet would have better usability than a Mac OS X netbook.
To me a product like that combines the worst of both worlds: painfully small for real work, and too awkward and bulky to carry easily.
Why would anyone need more than 640k of RAM?
Why would anyone want an LCD screen?
Why would anyone want a computer with no floppy drive?
Why would anyone need a GUI?
etc. etc. etc.