Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No chance.

If Apple do this - maybe it'll be better if Steve Jobs retired. These decisions are stupidity.

Why? Just because you don't want one?

When you are the CEO of a computer company maybe someone will listen to you!
 
Ives clearly states the MacBook Air was the first computer to use the unibody construction the the Notebook event last October.

Apple just haven't used the term in their marketing before then, hence people don't associate it with the Air.

That was the point of my post, but my punctuation was incorrect (now edited). The link shows that Apple refers to all the Alum machines as unibody.
 
Then it is not for you! Do you see the point of everything that is on sale in the world?

Do you?

noodlestrainer_b1.jpg


It's a USB noodle strainer.
 
I'd like to see it.

maybe it will have more ports...although I prefer the size of the 13" one.

why not make a netbook of similar style? 9 or 10" screen
 
To which we say:

WHY?! What's the point?!

The MacBook Air abysmally failed at being a really small, really thin computer, so now they're making it a really big, really thin computer?

I don't get it.

I agree with you and Eidorian on this one. Where the hell is Apple's roadmap for laptops or even desktops which right about now Apple fails at?

I don't see this rumor coming to fruition but I do know that a lot of tech junkies that don't do much with their machines but check Facebook will love to have a $2300 15" MBA with one USB port and a 1.6GHz processor.

But they don't have to take the optical drive out in order to reach 8 hours if it has a sealed battery. The 17" still has its Optical Drive....

I call this rumor as BS.

Not to mention that Sony has already destroyed the concept of the Air by producing an 11.1" notebook that is lighter than the Air and still totes an optional Blu-Ray disc drive.

Maxed out, it will be heavier than the Air and cost $4000, but you get TWO SSD, two USB, HDMI, media card reader, Blu-Ray, 3G/WiFi, LED backlit display and up to 7.5 hours of battery life.

Apple has yet to compete with that type of machine but considers putting out a 15" Air????? :confused:

Glad that's it's a rumor and has no possibility of coming true.

p.s. AND FIREWIRE!
 
The Air is as dead as the Cube.

The Cube resurrected into an affordable Mini, and the Air should resurrect into an affordable Netbook.
 
I think it would be a great idea. I'd buy one.

I'm just waiting for the release of Snow Leopard before pick up a MBAir but if they come out with a 15" version I'd definitely take that over the 13" assuming they can make it as thin and light.

I don't need any more ports than what the current one has but stereo speakers would be nice addition.
 
The Air is as dead as the Cube.

The Cube resurrected into the Mini, and the Air should resurrect into a Netbook.

Yeah... and look what is happening to the Mini... :rolleyes::p

Anyway, the Air isn't dead. The Air failed to be a netbook... because it isn't a netbook. Apple is testing a new genre of computer; they're meshing the best of both worlds.

They've made a thin computer to match the netbooks, but they know that tiny keyboards and tiny screens suck, so they made them full size.

It's a test, and they did better than most companies on their first shot. Apple needs to shave the bezel. If they make a really, really tiny bezel, the MacBook Air becomes a true ultraportable.
 
Failed where? The MBA is the best machine in its niche, and sells well for the market it's targeted for.

But I have to agree that this rumor is NONSENSE. The MBA is SUPPOSED to have a smaller screen, but not to the point of a puny netbook (the latest trendy crap); 15" models are more than well covered by the MB and the MBP. This rumor has no bearing in reality and is just a page filler.

The MBA is not a failure because it sells well, but netbooks that sell well are "trendy crap"? I'd say reverse that - if anything is trendy crap it's the MBA. Overpriced, underpowered, lack of features. But it looks slashy and swoopy.
 
Why would anyone want a 15" MacBook Air?

Why would anyone need more than 640k of RAM?

Why would anyone want an LCD screen?

Why would anyone want a computer with no floppy drive?

Why would anyone need a GUI?

etc. etc. etc.
 
Why would anyone need more than 640k of RAM?

Why would anyone want an LCD screen?

Why would anyone want a computer with no floppy drive?

Why would anyone need a GUI?

etc. etc. etc.

I like this guy....

I say the same thing for my 17" power house desktop replacement with quad core and 4 DIMM slots and dual HDDs. As a matter of fact, Apple should just go to Dell and copy all of the specs of the Covet which blows away any other machine spec wise, and price wise :(

Then when the consumer whiners that just d!ck around with their 15" Air ask why anyone would want a heavy computer that actually replaces the desktop and is a portable powerhouse for on location multi-stream HD editing coupdetat will have my back.

No, I am not being sarcastic. I want that machine from Apple more than anyone would want a 15" Air.
 
I would not call the Air a failure ... it seems to me that people who have never used it call it a failure. Having owned an Air now, I certainly love how light it is, how thin it is, and that I still get a nice bright 13" screen to work on if I'm on the road.

A 15" Air is a bad idea. A very very bad idea.


Exactly.
 
Where goeth Apple portables?

A few observations:

- The benchmark for portability is an A4/Letter size sheet of paper; that's what people have been carrying around for decades. If Apple can shrink the bezel gap of a 15" MBA to the point where the machine's not much bigger than the existing 13" MBA, then I think they'd ship it.

- I really don't think that Apple will make a MBA that weighs much more than the existing 3 lb unit. If they come up with some way to make a 15" widescreen MBA weigh insignificantly more than the existing unit (I dunno, magnesium case parts, polymer screen instead of glass, new lighter battery from 17" MBP, etc. Who knows...), then they'll greenlight the product.

- Steve has commented publicly that they're not interested in making a machine that has the reduced usability of a netbook (small screen, crappy keyboard, etc) & they're certainly not interested in competing in the netbook market based on price. If Apple released a NetMac or something even vaguely trying to target the netbook market, it would certainly cost at least $700 or so, and netbook buyers would snub them because of the price, regardless of how good the machine was. Apple's student machine is the plastic MacBook, which sells like crazy and is an amortized product for them; they have no reason to replace it with something cheaper for a long time.

- I think about the smallest laptop they'd make would use the existing keyboard size (maybe scrunched up a bit, but not by much), big(ish) trackpad, and an edge-to-edge screen. Probably in fact still a 13" or so screen (certainly not smaller than 12" widescreen), but with a lot less bezel gap around it.

- There's been a rumor recently that they'd be using NVidia's ION platform for the mac mini. I could see them using it in the AppleTV as it fits that product perfectly, but speaking as someone owning a netbook with Leopard on it I don't think that Atom (even dual-core) will run their apps the way they want it to. Now, maybe Apple's seen a next-generation Atom that will do what they want it to, but I think it's more likely that the next Mini (if it's ever released) will have a 9400M and MacBook-grade guts.
 
- I really don't think that Apple will make a MBA that weighs much more than the existing 3 lb unit. If they come up with some way to make a 15" widescreen MBA weigh insignificantly more than the existing unit (I dunno, magnesium case parts, polymer screen instead of glass, new lighter battery from 17" MBP, etc. Who knows...), then they'll greenlight the product.
AppleInsider had a MacBook Air carbon fiber rumor not long ago. Maybe it's for the 15" MacBook Air too?

- Steve has commented publicly that they're not interested in making a machine that has the reduced usability of a netbook (small screen, crappy keyboard, etc) & they're certainly not interested in competing in the netbook market based on price.
I would say that a properly done 7"~9" iPhone OS mini-tablet would have better usability than a Mac OS X netbook.

If Apple released a NetMac or something even vaguely trying to target the netbook market, it would certainly cost at least $700 or so, and netbook buyers would snub them because of the price, regardless of how good the machine was.
It might cost even more because Apple would want to make it as thin as possible, giving it worse components for higher prices.

- There's been a rumor recently that they'd be using NVidia's ION platform for the mac mini. I could see them using it in the AppleTV as it fits that product perfectly, but speaking as someone owning a netbook with Leopard on it I don't think that Atom (even dual-core) will run their apps the way they want it to.
I have a G4 and Keynote runs slow at times. If that's how an Atom Mac will be like, then I completely agree with you.
 
Is the Air doing as well as you fanboys are saying?

Not to me. I have never seen an Air in the wild. I've seen a bunch of the new MacBooks, but never an Air.

I've been buying Mac since the bondi-blue iMac. Now that was a success!
 
Why would anyone need more than 640k of RAM?

Why would anyone want an LCD screen?

Why would anyone want a computer with no floppy drive?

Why would anyone need a GUI?

etc. etc. etc.

What on earth..?

The MacBook Air is an ultra portable laptop. Make it a 15" and you are carrying a big foot print but really underpowered for what you could get for a little bit more thickness of the 15" MBP.

It isn't a "why would anyone want an LCD screen" question, don't know what your smoking to think that is relevant, it just is pointless.

Make it 15" and it isn't an ultra portable laptop.

Thin isn't that good a thing..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.