Originally posted by ABassCube
The graphics cards in Macs are still pathetic compared to PCs.
Originally posted by chazmox
But now they're sounding more and more like MacWhispers...
First there was the rumor about the OS on the new PB ( some had 10.2.7, some had Panther, some had Panther lite??? ) and next the rumor the PB's would not be announced in Paris.
Now that every reliable site says that Paris will be it, the come out with this CYA ( cover your ass ) story that the PB's are ready to ship...
Geez!![]()
Originally posted by Puppies
I was going to buy a PowerBook and use it as my main system at home and work. Increasingly Im realizing that as much as I hate to admit it, the three main apps I use work better (or only) on Windows so its already iffy as to whether I should be buying a Mac at all right now. If Apple puts outdated hardware in a PowerBook, that makes my decision that much easier.
How does something like a video card make it "outdated?" With laptops I haven't seen many choices w/o resulting in big time $$$ for better video cards. I certainly understand your problem with the apps but unless you do graphics work (am assuming no games since it is for work) most of the video cards work just fine for office, the web and many other apps - even photoshop.
Originally posted by bentmywookie
I could be totally wrong, but if there is more RAM, doesn't that mean there is more circuitry (hence resistance) that needs to be driven? That would increase the power requirements right?
Honestly though, I know very little EE and CompE so if someone knows better and could clarify that would be great.
Originally posted by Plutoniq
........And by that notion, Apple did release two Powerbooks in a row with the same ATI Rage 128M AGP, actually three if you include the Ibook
p'z
How many times have we heard this ... BUT on this occasion you may at LAST be right!!Originally posted by yossele
We'll just have to wait another day.
Originally posted by cb911
so Apple has never released a PowerBook without a video upgrade. i just hope they continue that trend with the new PB's. i'm not too sure whether or not to trust PowerPage.org though...![]()
Originally posted by neutrino23
Rarely do they use ATI or NVidia. Worse, they often don't even have dedicated graphics memory. They share graphics memory with main memory. How pathetic is that?
Yeah, no kidding! We have a brand new DELL desktop at work that SHARES MEMORY!?!?
2.2 Ghz Pentium and it takes like 10 seconds for all of the ICONS to redraw on the DESKTOP when starting up!!!
You get what you pay for!
Originally posted by Puppies
To be fair, you can build a very high end 3Ghz P4 system with a Radeon 9800 Pro for about $1000.
Pentium 4 3 Ghz: $383.00
Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB: $294.75
RAM PC 3500 512MB: $80.00
Motherboard MSI 875P NEO-FIS2R: $136.00
Hard Drive Maxtor Serial ATA: $100
Total: $993-
This system does not include a keyboard, mouse, superdrive, case or OS. I didn't use the top of the line parts for everything either. You'll be running around different stores trying to get these prices, pita. You'll probably run another 300 to 400 at least after buying the rest of your equipment, unless, you go cheap. The case will run nearly $100 for a pretty good one.
Some of those stores on pricewatch seem sketch. You'll never know if you'll get a good board or proc or not. Could end up costing you a lot more time than you thought... Time = Money...
It's all good. Just thought for a top of the line system your guesstimate was a bit off. Plus I'd never do Windows XP home edition... I built a great AMD system that was about 1k when I put it together. It's great, but I still use my G3 400 (800mhz upgrade) for most things.Originally posted by Puppies
Okay, so my quick mental estimate was off by a couple hundred bucks. My point stands, x86 hardware is much, much cheaper, even high quality x86 hardware. Here are components I quickly threw in the cart from Newegg. You could shave off another few hundred dollars easily by going with a slower processor or GPU, or you could go up to a DVD+-RW, add a better sound card, or whatever. But regardless, it probably kicks the Dual 2GHz G5s butt at games, for less than half the price (and probably beats-for example-the 1.6Ghz G5 at everything for significantly less). Believe me, I like Apple, and I *HATE* Microsoft, but Im not going to pretend Apples hardware is a better value on a price/performance basis.
-ANTEC LIFE STYLE SERIES SONATA PIANO BLACK Model# Sonata w/ ANTEC TRUE380 380W Power Supply
-Sony CDRW/DVD Combo Drive Model CRX300E/A OEM
-Seagate 120GB 7200rpm SATA Hard Drive Barracuda 7200.7 ST3120026AS OEM
-Intel Pentium 4 (800 FSB) Motherboard Model BOXD865PERL - RETAIL
-Intel Pentium 4 / 3.0CGHz 512k socket 478 Hyper Threading Technology 800 MHz FSB RETAIL
-Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition with Service Pack SP1a OEM
-SAPPHIRE OEM RADEON 9800 PRO 128MB DVI/TV 8X AGP BULK
Plus $95 for 512MB of PC3200 RAM from Crucial, and the total comes to:
$1259 (plus maybe $40 for a mouse and keyboard), so basically $1300 for a very nicely equipped x86 system with near top of the line components, from one of the most reputable stores on the net.
At any rate, my original point was that I'm already on the edge about dropping $3000 on a Powerbook anyway. A bad GPU is going to tilt me towards spending (far less) money on my existing systems.
Guess we'll find out pretty soonI've pretty much made up my mind that if the 'Books are G5s, I'm buying. If the prices are significantly lowered, with a decent hardware upgrade, I'm buying. Otherwise, I'll just have to make up my mind about it
![]()