FALSE. Sorry for shouting, but when you say "RAM requirements have stayed pretty stable" you are unequivocally wrong. RAM requirements have been steadily increasing since the 128k Macs of 1984. In the most recent last decade Apple met those increasing demands with 2016 MBPs 16 GB max RAM, 2022 MBPs 96 GB max RAM, 2025 MBPs 128 GB max RAM.
I disagree with you. Shouting or not shouting won't change that. It's not an emotional reaction. The only thing that has substantially increased Ram usage on a Mac recently is Apple Intelligence, which, to be honest, I don't sue because I've no interest in making avatars, AI generated picture or emojis, and 'm capable of sorting ut my email inbox by myself. In fact, in the last two macOS version releases, and if you discount AppleIntelligence ( which I do, because I've turned it off), RAM usage by the OS has actually decreased. Only nominally, but it has decreased, and not increased.
The case of maximum Ram you're presenting is only maximum Ram, not the actual Ram shipped in those machines. Very few buyers are maxing out the RAM options. The reality is well over 90% of professionals, e.g. professional educators, professional management consultants, professional writers, professional corporate trainers, professional beauty therapists have no need for that increased maximum limit, and for them, ether has been little to no increase in their RAM needs.
You're also blurring the lines by saying MacBook Pro and listing years, when the fundamental architecture between Intel and Apple Silicon is different, and you also are just saying MBP without distinguishing between base M chip, M chip pro and M chip Max.
And of course you can disagree with me too. But shouting FALSE is not a persuasive argument. It might make yourself feel better, but it's not going to swing the debate. It might be how contemporary politicians behave, but it's not working out well for them, and thankfully we're not politicians.