Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,734
39,680


Apple's top-of-the-line 16-inch M3 Max MacBook Pro costs $7,200 when you opt for all upgrades. Pricing used to top out at $6,499, but with support for 128GB Unified Memory, maximum memory now costs $1,000.

m3-macbook-pro-1.jpg

The highest-end 16-inch MacBook Pro has a base cost of $4,000 with 16-core CPU, 40-core GPU, 48GB Unified memory, and 1TB SSD. Fully upgrading the memory costs $1,000, while opting for an 8TB SSD adds another $2,200. The 14-inch MacBook Pro can be purchased with the same upgraded specs for $6,899.

128GB Unified Memory is only available with the M3 Max chip. The M3 chip is limited to 24GB Unified Memory like the M2 chip, while the M2 Pro supports up to 36GB Unified Memory.

The new MacBook Pro models can be ordered now from Apple's online store. The M3 and M3 Pro models will ship out to customers next week, while the M3 Max models will be coming later in November.

Article Link: 16-Inch M3 Max MacBook Pro Now Costs $7,200 With All Upgrades
 
Every year, we see the max-configured price and everybody loses their minds. So, now's a perfect time to buy an M1/M2 Pro or Max MBP if you want to save some money but still get amazing performance. Many businesses are going to get these more expensive M3 machines because they save precious time. My main beef with Apple is the SSD pricing, but it's not so bad I'll abstain. I'll just go 4TB instead of 8.
 
The highest-end 16-inch MacBook Pro has a base cost of $4,000 with 16-core CPU, 40-core GPU, 48GB Unified memory, and 1TB SSD. Fully upgrading the memory costs $1,000...
So an extra 80GB of memory (48GB + 80GB upgrade = 128GB max) will cost you $1,000? 😲

That's $12.50 per 1GB 😲
 
I get portability has its price (screen, keyboard, etc) and the engineering needed to make this all work in a tiny package isn’t cheap; but $4k base for M3M MBP is Mac Studio Ultra territory. I’m sure some professional will earn that money right back with time saved, but good lord is that mega-cheddar.
 
who can afford this crap. Looks great.. but I am so done with apple. They can claim being the fastest at whatever, but if you can't sell it to a modest consumer market, who cares. SGI machines back in the day were amazing, no one could afford them... Just sad. If it was 3-4g, I could maybe justify that.
 
So an extra 80GB of memory will cost you $1,000? 😲

That's $12.50 per 1GB 😲

Com'on... just shop around... robust RAM competition will motivate better pricing.

Oh wait!

Well, make up for it on SSDs from competitors.

Oh wait!

Well, at least they passed through the savings by not having to pay that Intel premium anymore.

Oh wait!

The true joy$ of $ilicon! ;)
 
I’m ready to pull the trigger (8'500 eur here in Europe 😏 that’s like 15% more expensive for no reason - VAT?) but I need to make sure first my 8TB SSD on the 16'' Max will be as fast as the M1 Max.

Also I would gladly extend it to 16TB if only Apple decided to finally offer more TB!! So annoying.
 
Here is what I think Apple is doing to keep the upgrade train going.
1. Increased the base RAM from 16Gb to 18GB.
2. Expanded on the GPU to add Raytracing, Neural engine performance.
3. 100nits more base brightness.
The above 3 features increase battery consumption significantly. How are they going to compensate for that without increasing the battery capacity?
They gut features of course. Like this...
  1. Swap 2 performance cores with 2 efficiency cores.
  2. Remove 1 GPU core.
  3. Reduce memory bandwidth from 200GB/s to 150GB/s.
The 3nm process does help some here but not a lot. I suspect we wont see any improvement in benchmarks compared to the M2 Pro. I suspect they will add the cores back when M4 rolls out next year to keep the upgrade train going.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.