Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think the weight difference between the 16” M1 Pro versus Max means the 16” M1 Max may get slightly better fans and/or a better heat dissipation system. This is not the case with the 14” M1 Pro versus Max because probably the 14” M1 Max is simply too small to contain a more aggressive cooling solution. This may mean that the 14” M1 Max could thermally throttle under heavy loads. Only testing will tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: asdfjkl;
Minimum difference is 4.6 grams, max difference is 90.7 grams...

1634646984351.png


... guess who's unnecessarily overexcited by their first new MacBook in far too long? 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichardGroves
Very excited to get one of these in at work and have a look at them. My pick would be the 14" as you can still spec it as fully as the 16" (something I've always wanted to be possible on the old 13") so you get the best mix of raw power and supreme portability. I appreciate that the battery life takes a hit due to it having a smaller battery, but it's still great.

I think the 16" may be too heavy to be a laptop that gets lugged around everywhere. My work-issued 2019 16" kills my shoulder in a messenger bag, so maybe I just need a backpack to more evenly spread the load.
 
Last edited:
so why? because it is not the different SoC size...thats 10-20 grams at most...maybe bigger vents?
If so...then the 14" maxed out will get thermal throttling for sure
The larger surface area of the max chip requires a larger copper heatsink to cover it. Just enough added weight to increase the decimal point by 1.
 
could be underclocking the chip. I don’t know that I saw any specs on clock speed
Could be, but in the keynote they specifically stated that you got the same....can't remember the exact phrasing, but basically "performance" in either size model. It was an Apple "first" according to them, so I would be very surprised if they throttled the 14". But maybe!
 
Performance should be worth the extra weight. When you think about it the trade off is minimal
 
Waiting for iFixit to show us that the MAX has better cooling, but this almost confirms it.
 
What I really want to know is in the increased size did they improve the thermal dissipation such that the highest spec CPU doesn't throttle 80% of the time like it does on my MBPro 2.4Ghz 8 Core i9 with 64Gn ram which often slows to a crawl just multitasking office apps with lots of browser tabs open. Multitasking of the newer OSes is useless. I remember using a Mac Mini single-chip G4 with 1Gb ram and I could have MS office open my accounting software FileMaker pro. Photoshop and burn 2 DVD's with no errors in the background and the foreground app felt like nothing else was happening. The new OS you HAVE to run makes the foreground app feel like I am rendering a video in the background when it's just office apps often stutters etc

If I buy the top of the line again will it overheat on basic multitasking, run out of memory like 64Gb does in Big Sur on the i9 so often will it suck so hard I want to go back to my 2012 i7 MBPro with just 16Gb ram 4Tb Samsung SSD and a 2Tb HD in the DVD bay and run High Sierra blitz fast? The new OSes are just some kids wanking off in One Infinite Loop. I need to actually work not wait for basics!!! FFS
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Arsenikdote
Waiting for the MacBook Air revision 2 with M2 and no fans. I don't run Final Cut Pro and be ok with a thin and light laptop with next generation technology.
 
Photoshop and burn 2 DVD's with no errors in the background and the foreground app felt like nothing else was happening.

I remember those days! :D I feel like the M1 has a lot of those capabilities but looking to see if the new M1 Max can handle my harder workflow requirements and still feel like the M1 does....like back in the "good ol days"! Here's to hoping!
 
What's most likely happened is that the M1 Pro machine is *just* under 4.65 pounds whereas the M1 Max chip is *just* over 4.65 pounds so one gets rounded down to 4.6 and the other gets rounded up to 4.7. The difference is probably less than an ounce in Freedom units.
Are you referring to the avoirdupois ounce, defined based on the avoirdupois pound, which is itself defined by the kilogram? And hence the French Freedom Fighters? ? ??

(Just kidding, I know the avoirdupois pound was invented in Italy. But I couldn't think of a Troy ounce joke in time to post this.)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.